首页> 外文期刊>Aslib Proceedings >Do journal data sharing mandates work? Life sciences evidence from Dryad
【24h】

Do journal data sharing mandates work? Life sciences evidence from Dryad

机译:日记数据共享任务有效吗?来自Dryad的生命科学证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Data sharing is widely thought to help research quality and efficiency. Data sharing mandates are increasingly being adopted by journals and the purpose of this paper is to assess whether they work. Design/methodology/approach - This study examines two evolutionary biology journals, Evolution and Heredity, that have data sharing mandates and make extensive use of Dryad. It uses a quantitative analysis of presence in Dryad, downloads and citations. Findings - Within both journals, data sharing seems to be complete, showing that the mandates work on a technical level. Low correlations (0.15-0.18) between data downloads and article citation counts for articles published in 2012 within these journals indicate a weak relationship between data sharing and research impact. An average of 40-55 data downloads per article after a few years suggests that some use is found for shared life sciences data. Research limitations/implications - The value of shared data uses is unclear. Practical implications - Data sharing mandates should be encouraged as an effective strategy. Originality/value - This is the first analysis of the effectiveness of data sharing mandates.
机译:目的-广泛认为数据共享有助于提高研究质量和效率。期刊越来越多地采用数据共享授权,因此本文旨在评估它们是否有效。设计/方法论/方法-这项研究研究了两种进化生物学期刊《进化》和《遗传》,它们具有共享数据的职责并广泛使用树妖。它对Dryad,下载和引用中的存在进行定量分析。调查结果-在这两种期刊中,数据共享似乎都是完整的,表明任务授权是在技术层面上进行的。这些期刊中2012年发表的文章的数据下载与文章引用计数之间的低相关性(0.15-0.18)表明数据共享与研究影响之间的关系较弱。几年后,每篇文章的平均下载量为40-55次,这表明共享生命科学数据得到了一定的利用。研究局限性/含义-共享数据使用的价值尚不清楚。实际意义-应鼓励将数据共享授权作为一种有效策略。原创性/价值-这是对数据共享授权有效性的首次分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号