首页> 外文期刊>Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East >Social Morality and Social Misfits: Confucius, Hegel, and the Attack of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard
【24h】

Social Morality and Social Misfits: Confucius, Hegel, and the Attack of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard

机译:社会道德与社会不适应:孔子,黑格尔,庄子和克尔凯郭尔的袭击

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is a remarkable and surprising connection to be found between an argument of S??ren Kierkegaard's and one of Zhuangzi'sa??what I call the a??social misfita?? critique. I will argue that this connection highlights a hitherto unacknowledged parallel between the moral thought of their respective targets: Hegel in the case of Kierkegaard and Confucius in the case of Zhuangzi. Specifically, it reveals a significant parallel between Hegel's movement from Moralitat to Sittlichkeit and Confuciusa?? position on the central and irreducible role of li (ritual or propriety) in morality. I will begin by briefly tracing the a??social misfita?? critique as it is found in Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling and in the Zhuangzi. In Section 2, I will sketch Hegel's argument for the indispensability and irreducibility of social norms (Sittlichkeit) for morality, and reflect on the implications of this move for the possibility of social criticism. Finally, I will argue that Confucius can be understood as articulating a vision of morality and of social criticism very close to Hegel's.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2012.729326
机译:S?ren Kierkegaard的论点与庄子的一个论点之间存在着惊人而令人惊讶的联系,我称之为“社会不当行为”。批判。我将争辩说,这种联系凸显了他们各自目标的道德思想之间前所未有的相似之处:基格尔凯德案中的黑格尔和庄子案中的孔子。具体来说,它揭示了黑格尔从莫拉利塔特到锡特里奇凯特和孔夫乔萨的运动之间的重大相似之处。关于礼(礼节或礼节)在道德中的核心和不可还原的作用的立场。我将简要地追溯一下“社会误解”一词。在克尔凯郭尔的《恐惧与颤抖》和《庄子》中都发现了这种批评。在第二部分中,我将概述黑格尔关于道德的社会规范(Sittlichkeit)不可或缺的论点,并思考此举对社会批评可能性的影响。最后,我认为孔子可以理解为非常接近黑格尔的道德观和社会批评观。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes, twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2012.729326

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号