首页> 外文期刊>Asian Philosophy >Traditional Chinese Thought: Philosophy or Religion?
【24h】

Traditional Chinese Thought: Philosophy or Religion?

机译:中国传统思想:哲学还是宗教?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Contemporary theoretical streams in sinology and modern Chinese philosophy have devoted increasing attention to investigating and comparing the substantial and methodological assumptions of the so-called 'Eastern' and 'Western' traditions. In spite of the complexity of these problems, the most important methodological condition for arriving at some reasonably valid conclusions will undoubtedly be satisfied if we consciously endeavor to preserve the characteristic structural blocks and observe the specific categorical laws of the cultural contexts being discussed. Whenever sinologists speak of Chinese philosophy, they must inevitably consider the appropriateness of this term. Due to the fact, that the general theory and genuine philosophical aspects of Chinese thought have only rarely been treated by Western scholars, they namely continue to remain quite obscure for the majority of them. Therefore, we must examine the fundamental question (or dilemma) of whether it is possible to speak of traditional Chinese thought as philosophy at all.
机译:汉学和现代中国哲学的当代理论流已经越来越重视研究和比较所谓的“东方”和“西方”传统的实质和方法论假设。尽管存在这些问题的复杂性,但如果我们有意识地努力保留特征性的结构块并遵守所讨论文化语境的具体分类法则,无疑会满足得出某些合理有效结论的最重要方法论条件。每当汉学家谈论中国哲学时,他们都必然会考虑这个词的恰当性。由于这一事实,西方学者很少对中国思想的一般理论和真正的哲学方面给予过重视,也就是说,对于大多数学者而言,它们仍然是相当晦涩的。因此,我们必须研究一个基本问题(或困境),即是否有可能将传统中国思想说成是哲学。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Asian Philosophy》 |2009年第3期|p.225-237|共13页
  • 作者

    Jana S. Rosker;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:05:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号