首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Communication >Perpetual development journalism? Balance and framing in the 2006 Singapore election coverage
【24h】

Perpetual development journalism? Balance and framing in the 2006 Singapore election coverage

机译:永续发展的新闻业? 2006年新加坡大选报道的平衡与框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study sought to determine if Singapore's press model has evolved beyond the development model to take on characteristics of other press models. It examined balance and framing in election coverage in the Straits Times, Singapore's dominant English newspaper, over 16 days before the 2006 Singapore General Election. As expected under the development model, and contrary to expectations under the social responsibility model, we found coverage of the competing parties lacked balance, as indicated by more coverage with a more favorable tone for the ruling People's Action Party. In framing, we found game frames predominated over issue frames, as predicted by media intrusion theory, in which commercial media favor competitive aspects of campaigns as a result of following commercial journalistic values. This finding contradicts the expectation that development journalism would likely have more issue frames, since it emphasizes issues and policies, and suggests that some commercial journalistic imperatives outweigh development model imperatives in the Singapore press.
机译:这项研究试图确定新加坡的新闻模式是否已经超越发展模式而发展为具有其他新闻模式的特征。它在2006年新加坡大选之前的16天里,研究了新加坡主要英语报纸《海峡时报》在选举报道中的平衡点和框架。正如发展模式所期望的那样,与社会责任模式所期望的相反,我们发现竞争方的报道缺乏平衡,这一点表明,执政的人民行动党的报道范围更大,语气更有利。在框架中,我们发现游戏框架比发行框架更为重要,正如媒体入侵理论所预测的那样,在商业框架中,商业媒体由于遵循商业新闻价值而偏爱竞选活动的竞争方面。这一发现与人们对发展新闻可能会拥有更多问题框架的预期相矛盾,因为它强调了问题和政策,并暗示了一些商业新闻的要求超过了新加坡新闻界对发展模式的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号