首页> 外文期刊>ASHRAE Transactions >Comparing Residential Furnace Blowers for Rating and Installed Performance
【24h】

Comparing Residential Furnace Blowers for Rating and Installed Performance

机译:比较住宅鼓风机的额定功率和安装性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The objective of this study was to assess the performance of residential furnace blowers for both heating, coolingand air distribution applications and to compare their performance at DOE/ARI rating conditions (for AFUE and SEER) and at real installed conditions. A testing program was undertaken at two laboratories to compare the performance of furnace blowers over a range of static pressure differences that included standard rating points and measured field test pressures. Three different combinations of blowers and residential furnaces were tested. The laboratory test results for blower power and airflow were combined with D0E2 models of building loads, models of air conditioner performance, standby power, as well as igniter and combustion air blower power to determine potential energy and peak demand impacts. The results show distinct differences between the two types of furnace blower motor technology: Permanent Split Capacitor (PSC) and more efficient Brushless Permanent Magnet (BPM). The high static pressure differences in real installations reduce the advantage that BPM driven blowers have at DOE/ARI rating conditions such that for cooling the two motor technologies have essentially the same power consumption although the reduction in airflow for the PSC driven blower results in 10% lower air conditioner efficiency. For heating, the advantage of the BPM blower is approximately halved when changing from standard test conditions to installed conditions, although the BPM blower has the advantage of maintaining airflow that avoids the safety implications of the PSC blower's lower airflow. The BPM blowerretains its advantage for multi-speed systems that can operate for significant numbers of hours in low-fire mode. To better reflect blower performance it is recommended that appliance rating test procedures be amended to use realistic system static pressures of between 0.5 and 0.8 in. water (125 and 200 Pa) and that utility rebate programs ensure that rebates are provided for multi-speed systems and/or systems that have afield measured low static pressure difference below 0.5 in. water (125 Pa).
机译:这项研究的目的是评估民用炉式鼓风机在供暖,制冷和空气分配应用中的性能,并比较它们在DOE / ARI额定条件(对于AFUE和SEER)和实际安装条件下的性能。在两个实验室进行了一项测试程序,以比较炉鼓风机在包括标准额定值和实测测试压力在内的一系列静压差范围内的性能。测试了鼓风机和家用炉的三种不同组合。将鼓风机功率和气流的实验室测试结果与D0E2建筑负载模型,空调性能,备用功率以及点火器和燃烧鼓风机功率模型相结合,以确定潜在的能量和峰值需求影响。结果表明,两种类型的鼓风机电机技术之间存在明显差异:永磁分体式电容器(PSC)和更高效的无刷永磁体(BPM)。实际安装中的高静压差降低了BPM驱动的鼓风机在DOE / ARI额定条件下的优势,因此,虽然PSC驱动的鼓风机的气流减少了10%,但两种电机技术的冷却能耗基本相同。降低空调效率。对于加热,从标准测试条件更改为安装条件时,BPM鼓风机的优势大约减少了一半,尽管BPM鼓风机具有保持气流的优势,避免了PSC鼓风机较低气流的安全隐患。 BPM鼓风机对于在低火模式下可以运行大量小时的多速系统保持优势。为了更好地反映鼓风机性能,建议修改设备额定测试程序,以使用介于0.5和0.8英寸水(125和200 Pa)之间的实际系统静压,并且公用程序回扣计划确保为多速系统提供回扣。和/或在野外测得的静水压差低于0.5英寸水(125 Pa)的系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号