首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Intelligence and Law >An Ontology In Owl For Legal Case-based Reasoning
【24h】

An Ontology In Owl For Legal Case-based Reasoning

机译:猫头鹰基于法律案例推理的本体

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The paper gives ontologies in the Web Ontology Language (OWL) for Legal Case-based Reasoning (LCBR) systems, giving explicit, formal, and general specifications of a conceptualisation LCBR. Ontologies for different systems allows comparison and contrast between them. OWL ontologies are standardised, machine-readable formats that support automated processing with Semantic Web applications. Intermediate concepts', concepts between base-level concepts and higher level concepts, are central in LCBR. The main issues and their relevance to ontological reasoning and to LCBR are discussed. Two LCBR systems (AS-CATO, which is based on CATO, and IBP) are analysed in terms of basic and intermediate concepts. Central components of the OWL ontologies for these systems are presented, pointing out differences and similarities. The main novelty of the paper is the ontological analysis and representation in OWL of LCBR systems. The paper also emphasises the important issues concerning the representation and reasoning of intermediate concepts.
机译:本文提供了基于法律案例推理(LCBR)的Web本体语言(OWL)中的本体,并给出了概念化LCBR的明确,正式和一般规范。不同系统的本体允许它们之间的比较和对比。 OWL本体是标准化的机器可读格式,支持使用语义Web应用程序进行自动处理。中间概念,即基础概念和高级概念之间的概念,在LCBR中至关重要。讨论了主要问题及其与本体推理和LCBR的相关性。根据基本概念和中间概念对两个LCBR系统(基于CATO的AS-CATO和IBP)进行了分析。介绍了这些系统的OWL本体的主要组成部分,指出了不同点和相似点。本文的主要新颖之处在于LCBR系统的OWL中的本体分析和表示。本文还强调了有关中间概念的表示和推理的重要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号