首页> 外文期刊>Architectural theory review >NEW BELGRADE AFTER 1999: SPATIAL VIOLENCE AS DE-SOCIALISATION, DE-ROMANISATION, AND DE-HISTORISATION
【24h】

NEW BELGRADE AFTER 1999: SPATIAL VIOLENCE AS DE-SOCIALISATION, DE-ROMANISATION, AND DE-HISTORISATION

机译:1999年之后的新贝尔格莱德:去暴力,去罗马化和去历史化的空间暴力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

New Belgrade after 1999 is associated with the transition from a socialist and single-party state to a consumer capitalist and multi-party system, these latter features perceived as indicators of democracy. This text asks if and how this transitional period points to NATO's 1999 bombing campaign still being in-operation through spatial violence by other means, with these means related to the negation of difference and the transformation of everyday life and social values. Might this spatial violence be even more coercive than that of the war as it manifests through the convergence of military, legal, governmental, and economic entities of international "redevelopment" agencies working in the name of "security" along with the Serbian government? The focus here is on the post-1999 transformation and re-modernisation of New Belgrade as an elimination of difference through processes of de-socialisation, de-Romanisation, and de-historisation connected with neo-liberal privatisation.
机译:1999年以后的新贝尔格莱德与社会主义和一党制国家向消费资本主义和多党制的过渡有关,后者被视为民主的指标。这篇文章问这个过渡时期是否以及如何指向北约1999年的轰炸行动仍然通过其他手段通过空间暴力进行,这些手段与否定差异,改变日常生活和社会价值有关。通过以“安全”的名义与塞尔维亚政府一起工作的国际“重建”机构的军事,法律,政府和经济实体的融合,这种空间暴力是否比战争更具强制性?这里的重点是在新贝尔格莱德的1999年后转型和重新现代化,以通过与新自由主义私有化相关的去社会化,去罗马化和去历史化过程消除差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Architectural theory review》 |2014年第3期|267355-375|共22页
  • 作者

    NIKOLINA BOBIC;

  • 作者单位

    Plymouth University, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:21:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号