首页> 外文期刊>Applied Measurement in Education >Mathematics Performance of Students With and Without Disabilities Under Accommodated Conditions Using Resource Guides and Calculators on High Stakes Tests
【24h】

Mathematics Performance of Students With and Without Disabilities Under Accommodated Conditions Using Resource Guides and Calculators on High Stakes Tests

机译:使用资源指南和计算器在高分测试中适应条件下有和没有残疾学生的数学表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examines the effects of two test administration accommodations on the mathematics performance of students within the context of a large-scale statewide assessment. The two test administration accommodations were resource guides and calculators. A stratified random sample of schools was selected to represent the demographic characteristics of the state. The sample included both students with and without disabilities. Schools were randomly assigned to one of three possible administration conditions: resource guides, calculators, or standard administration. A repeated-measures design (pretest and posttest) was used to examine the effects of the accommodations. Students in the participating schools took the operational version of the statewide assessment in grades 3 and 6 in the spring of 2005, and then were retested in grades 4 (N = 947) and 7 (N = 997) with the same form of the test under one of the three administration conditions in the spring of 2006. The results of this study suggest that the use of resource guides were not effective. The results for the use of calculators as a test administration accommodation were somewhat mixed with both small positive and small negative effects sizes varying by grade. Exploratory analyses on subgroups of students with various disabilities suggest that there may be small positive benefits for some students in some disability categories under some accommodated conditions.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2010.485975
机译:本研究在大规模的全州评估范围内,考察了两种考试管理方式对学生数学成绩的影响。考试管理的两个设施是资源指南和计算器。选择分层的学校样本以代表该州的人口特征。样本包括有和没有残疾的学生。学校被随机分配到以下三种可能的管理条件之一:资源指南,计算器或标准管理。重复测量设计(前测和后测)用于检查调节的效果。参与学校的学生于2005年春季进行了三年级和六年级的全州评估操作版本,然后以相同的测试形式对四年级(N = 947)和7年级(N = 997)进行了重新测试。在2006年春季,这是三种管理条件之一。本研究的结果表明,使用资源指南无效。使用计算器作为考试管理机构的结果在某种程度上混杂了小的积极影响和小的负面影响,大小随等级而变化。对各种残疾学生亚组的探索性分析表明,在某些适应条件下,某些残疾类别的某些学生可能会获得较小的正面收益。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2010.485975

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号