首页> 外文期刊>Applied Acoustics >Objective and subjective evaluations of the multi-channel auralization technique as applied to solo instruments
【24h】

Objective and subjective evaluations of the multi-channel auralization technique as applied to solo instruments

机译:应用于独奏乐器的多通道听觉化技术的主观和主观评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Auralizations are commonly used today by architectural acousticians as a tool to model acoustically sensitive spaces. This paper presents investigations employing an auralization methodology known as multi-channel auralizations, to determine the benefits of using an increasing number of channels in such auralizations. First an objective evaluation was conducted to examine how acoustic parameters, such as reverberation time, vary when using "quadrant" (one fourth of a spherical source) or "thirteenth" sources to create the binaural room impulse responses. Large differences in the values were found between the different sections of the sphere, on the order of several just noticeable differences. Two subjective studies were then pursued, first to determine if auralizations made with an increasing number of channels sound more realistic and have an increased perceived source size, using solo musical instruments of varying directivity indices as the sources. Overall, subjects perceived the auralizations made with an increasing number of channels as more realistic, whereas results for perceived source size are less clear. The second subjective study assessed the ease with which subjects could identify the source orientation from the auralizations as a function of number of channels. Results indicate that more channels made it easier for subjects to differentiate between source orientations.
机译:今天,建筑声学家通常将听觉化作为对声学敏感空间建模的工具。本文介绍了采用一种称为多通道听觉化的听觉化方法的研究,以确定在这种听觉化中使用越来越多的通道的好处。首先,进行客观评估,以检查当使用“象限”(球形声源的四分之一)或“十三”声源创建双耳室冲激响应时,声学参数(例如混响时间)如何变化。发现球体不同部分之间的值存在很大差异,其数量级只是几个明显的差异。然后进行了两项主观研究,首先是使用方向性指数各不相同的独奏乐器来确定用越来越多的声道进行的听觉听起来是否更逼真并且感知到的声源大小也有所增加。总体而言,受试者认为使用越来越多的通道进行的听觉化更为现实,而感知到的声源大小的结果则不太清楚。第二项主观研究评估了受试者根据听觉识别来源定向的难易程度,并以此作为通道数量的函数。结果表明,更多的渠道使受试者更容易区分来源方向。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Acoustics》 |2011年第6期|p.311-323|共13页
  • 作者单位

    University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Architectural Engineering Program. 1110 S. 67th Street. Omaha. NE 68182-0681. United States,University of Hartford, Mechanical Engineering, 200 Bloomfield Avenue, West Hartford, CT 06117, United States;

    University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Architectural Engineering Program. 1110 S. 67th Street. Omaha. NE 68182-0681. United States;

    Technical University of Denmark, Acoustic Technology, Building 352, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark,ODEON A/S, Scion DTU, Diplomvej, Bid. 381, DK-2800 Kgs.,Lyngby, Denmark;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    auralization; source directivity; listening tests; multi-channel;

    机译:听觉化源方向性听力测试;多渠道;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:30:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号