首页> 外文期刊>APICS >WHOSE SYSTEM IS IT, ANYWAY?
【24h】

WHOSE SYSTEM IS IT, ANYWAY?

机译:整个系统都是这样吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purchasing, inventory management, advanced scheduling, whatever―the type of system doesn't really matter. It's been the same old question since the beginning of computer systems: Whose system is it, anyway? I have been to APICS meetings and have heard discussions of information services (IS) people inflicting another of their software systems upon end users who are not sold on the idea. The promise of miraculously resolving all business problems seems to justify the action. But questions run through my head. How can the software system be a success if the end user is convinced it will be a hardship? How can IS people possibly know what the end users really need? How can top management determine what the best software system is without getting input from both the end users and IS? Is there any way to resolve these age-old conflicts? One thing is certain―both end users and IS must have an effective working relationship if they intend to implement their company objectives. How can this be accomplished?
机译:采购,库存管理,高级计划等任何类型的系统都不重要。自计算机系统问世以来,这一直是一个古老的问题:到底是谁的系统?我去过APICS会议,并且听过有关信息服务(IS)人员的讨论,这些人在未按此想法出售的最终用户身上使用了另一种软件系统。奇迹般地解决所有业务问题的承诺似乎证明了该行动的合理性。但是问题贯穿我的脑海。如果最终用户确信这将是艰难的,那么软件系统如何才能成功?人们如何才能知道最终用户的真正需求?高层管理人员如何在不从最终用户和IS双方获得输入的情况下确定最佳软件系统是什么?有什么办法可以解决这些古老的冲突?可以肯定的是,如果最终用户和IS要实现其公司目标,则他们必须具有有效的工作关系。如何做到这一点?

著录项

  • 来源
    《APICS》 |2003年第1期|p.56|共1页
  • 作者

    LUANN TOLLIVER;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 管理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号