首页> 外文期刊>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine >Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit
【24h】

Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit

机译:快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估,全身炎症反应综合征和早期预警评分,可用于检测重症监护室外感染患者的临床恶化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Rationale: The 2016 definitions of sepsis included the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score to identify high-risk patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU). Objectives: We sought to compare qSOFA with other commonly used early warning scores. Methods: All admitted patients who first met the criteria for suspicion of infection in the emergency department (ED) or hospital wards from November 2008 until January 2016 were included. The qSOFA, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) were compared for predicting death and ICU transfer. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 30,677 included patients, 1,649 (5.4%) died and 7,385 (24%) experienced the composite outcome (death or ICU transfer). Sixty percent (n = 18,523) first met the suspicion criteria in the ED. Discrimination for in-hospital mortality was highest for NEWS (area under the curve [AUC], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.79), followed by MEWS (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.71-0.74), qSOFA (AUC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.67-0.70), and SIRS (AUC, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.63-0.66) (P < 0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). Using the highest non-ICU score of patients, ≥2 SIRS had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 13% for the composite outcome compared with 54% and 67% for qSOFA ≥2, 59% and 70% for MEWS 3=5, and 67% and 66% for NEWS 3=8, respectively. Most patients met 3=2 SIRS criteria 17 hours before the combined outcome compared with 5 hours for ≥2 and 17 hours for ≥1 qSOFA criteria. Conclusions: Commonly used early warning scores are more accurate than the qSOFA score for predicting death and ICU transfer in non-ICU patients. These results suggest that the qSOFA score should not replace general early warning scores when risk-stratifying patients with suspected infection.
机译:理由:2016年对败血症的定义包括快速的败血症相关器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分,以识别重症监护病房(ICU)以外的高危患者。目标:我们试图将qSOFA与其他常用的预警得分进行比较。方法:纳入所有从2008年11月至2016年1月在急诊科(ED)或医院病房中首次达到怀疑感染标准的入院患者。比较了qSOFA,系统性炎症反应综合征(SIRS),改良预警得分(MEWS)和国家预警得分(NEWS),以预测死亡和ICU转移。测量和主要结果:在30,677名患者中,有1,649名(5.4%)死亡,而7,385名(24%)经历了综合性结局(死亡或ICU转移)。百分之六十(n = 18,523)首先符合急诊室的怀疑标准。 NEWS的院内死亡率最高(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.77; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.76-0.79),其次是MEWS(AUC为0.73; 95%CI为0.71-0.74) ,qSOFA(AUC,0.69; 95%CI,0.67-0.70)和SIRS(AUC,0.65; 95%CI,0.63-0.66)(对于所有成对比较,P <0.01)。使用最高的非ICU评分患者,≥2SIRS对复合结局的敏感性为91%,特异性为13%,而qSOFA≥2的敏感性为54%和67%,MEWS 3 = 5的敏感性为59%和70% ,对于NEWS 3 = 8分别为67%和66%。大多数患者在合并结局前17小时符合3 = 2 SIRS标准,而≥2和≥1 qSOFA标准则为5小时。结论:常用的预警评分比qSOFA评分更准确地预测非ICU患者的死亡和ICU转移。这些结果表明,在对可疑感染进行风险分层的患者时,qSOFA评分不能代替一般的预警评分。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois,Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;

    Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;

    Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;

    Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;

    Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;

    Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois,Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;

    Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois,Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    systemic inflammatory response syndrome; sepsis; organ dysfunction scores; early warning scores; qSOFA;

    机译:全身性炎症反应综合征败血症器官功能障碍评分;预警分数;沙发;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号