首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Max Weber and Economic Sociology: A Response to Peukert
【24h】

Max Weber and Economic Sociology: A Response to Peukert

机译:马克斯·韦伯与经济社会学:对皮克特的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Peukert (2004) argues that Weber's work is only of limited relevance to present-day economic sociology because it incorporates "a rather narrow and static understanding of rationality and the economy." This article disputes that claim. It is argued that Weber differentiates between economic and sociological perspectives on the economy through incorporating uncertainty into the latter. Hence Weber's economic sociology develops the distinction between "before" and "after" perspectives on action, incorporates expectations, and defines capital with reference to time and uncertainty. Furthermore, Weber's analysis of formal rationality presupposes uncertainty. Weber's economic sociology thus assumes a dynamic economy, where uncertainty is prevalent, and formal rationality can reduce uncertainty. Peukert's analysis thus (a) fails to consider Weber's differentiation between economic and sociological investigations, and (b) does not engage with Weber's knowledge of Austrian economics.
机译:Peukert(2004)认为,韦伯的工作与当今的经济社会学关系不大,因为它结合了“对理性和经济的相当狭窄和静态的理解”。本文对此主张提出异议。有人认为,韦伯通过将不确定性纳入经济中来区分经济和社会学观点。因此,韦伯的经济社会学发展了行动的“之前”和“之后”观点之间的区别,并纳入了期望,并根据时间和不确定性来定义资本。此外,韦伯对形式合理性的分析以不确定性为前提。韦伯的经济社会学因此假设了一个充满不确定性的动态经济,形式合理性可以减少不确定性。因此,Peukert的分析(a)未能考虑韦伯在经济和社会学研究之间的区别,并且(b)不参与韦伯对奥地利经济学的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号