首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >A Comparative Political Economy Approach to Farming Interest Groups in Australia and the United States
【24h】

A Comparative Political Economy Approach to Farming Interest Groups in Australia and the United States

机译:澳大利亚和美国农业利益集团的比较政治经济学方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Commons ([1950] 1970: 34) insisted that "economics should be the science of activity." In this tradition, the aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of farming interest groups on natural resource policy by using a comparative political economy approach. Special attention will be given to farming interest groups in Australia and the United States. Curiously, each group takes a very different ideological approach to promoting farming interests. Our contention is that each group tends to display values that were prominent during its formation. The ideology and thus behavior of interest groups cannot be isolated from the history, the economic conditions, and the changing alternatives open to individuals. It is very reasonable to argue that two groups with similar goals might pursue different means to the same ends; the different means simply reflect values that were important in the formation of the groups. As such, there might be a concerted effort of the farming interest group, based on history, economic conditions, and custom, to either encourage a higher degree of competition or protect against the degree of competition.
机译:Commons([1950] 1970:34)坚持认为“经济学应该是活动的科学”。在这种传统下,本文的目的是通过使用比较政治经济学方法来研究农业利益集团对自然资源政策的影响。将特别关注澳大利亚和美国的农业利益集团。奇怪的是,每个群体采取了非常不同的意识形态方法来促进农业利益。我们的争论是每个组倾向于显示在其形成过程中突出的价值。利益集团的意识形态和行为不能与历史,经济条件和对个人开放的替代方案隔离开来。有理由说,两个目标相似的团体可能会为同一目的追求不同的手段,这是很合理的。不同的方法仅反映了在组建中很重要的价值观。因此,农业利益集团可能会根据历史,经济条件和习俗做出共同努力,以鼓励更高程度的竞争或防止竞争程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号