首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Economics, Sociology, and the 'Professional Complex' Talcott Parsons and the Critique of Orthodox Economics
【24h】

Economics, Sociology, and the 'Professional Complex' Talcott Parsons and the Critique of Orthodox Economics

机译:经济学,社会学和“专业综合体” Talcott Parsons对正统经济学的批判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article discusses the relationship between economics and sociology in the context of Parsons's analytical theory of action and systems and his criticisms of orthodox and institutional economics. The article also addresses his view of the importance of the professions to an understanding of the nature of advanced capitalism. The professions are discussed as both an illustration of his theoretical argument and a substantive problem that stimulated the development of his theory. The "professional complex" is an emergent phenomenon in capitalism that modifies its operation and points to the complexity of systems of social action that require to be analyzed without being reduced to one of their elements. This reductionism is evident in orthodox economic theory and also in the more sociologically-oriented approach of institutional economics. Parsons argues that each is a form of what, following Whitehead, he calls the "fallacy of misplaced concreteness." Although Parsons offers a significant critique of dominant approaches in economics, major flaws within his own theory create the appearance that he has simply carried over the deficiencies of orthodox theory into his own general statement of theory. These flaws contribute to major misunderstandings of Parsons's project and, therefore, indicate continuing problems in the relation between economics and sociology.
机译:本文在帕森斯的行为和系统分析理论以及他对正统和制度经济学的批评的背景下,讨论了经济学与社会学之间的关系。本文还阐述了他的观点,即专业对理解先进资本主义性质的重要性。讨论这些专业既是对他的理论论证的例证,又是刺激他理论发展的实质性问题。 “专业复合体”是资本主义中的一种新兴现象,它改变了资本主义的运作方式,并指出了需要分析而又不简化为一种要素的社会行为体系的复杂性。这种还原主义在正统经济学理论中以及在更以社会学为导向的制度经济学方法中都是显而易见的。帕森斯认为,每种形式都是怀特海德之后的一种形式,他称之为“放错了具体性的谬误”。尽管帕森斯对经济学中的主流方法提出了重要的批评,但他本人理论中的重大缺陷使他看上去只是将正统理论的不足转嫁到了他自己的一般性理论陈述中。这些缺陷导致对帕森斯项目的重大误解,因此,表明经济学与社会学之间的关系仍存在问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号