首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Crime and Punishment in Ancient China and Its Relevance Today
【24h】

Crime and Punishment in Ancient China and Its Relevance Today

机译:中国古代犯罪与刑罚及其今天的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The legal system of a nation and its response to crime reflect the economic, political, and cultural conditions prevailing at the time, as well as popular values and customs. In the case of China, the oldest continuous civilization in the world, the criminal justice system contains ancient traditions that are still influential. The cosmological tradition, which has the longest history, treated nature as the victim when human actions violated social norms. Thus, harsh punishments were imposed that rigidly mimicked violent aspects of nature: if the victim died, even by accident, someone must die to balance the harm caused to nature. The Confucian tradition developed a competing natural philosophy that tempered punishment by restoring social and natural order through moral education about proper behavior. Confucianism was designed to maintain civility in the absence of central authority by persuading leaders to create a harmonious society based on the limited use of raw power and punishment. Finally, the Legalist tradition restored harsh punishment as a way to impose order upon a fragmented society in which local despots had been carrying out arbitrary judgments. But Legalism carried the seeds of its own destruction and required Confucianism to balance it in creating a durable system of governance and justice. Each tradition developed as a way of solving a specific set of social and political problems, and each persisted as a partial solution to perennial questions about how to deal with social disorder. Even though criminal justice in China was Westernized after 1911, the older traditions still have an influence. Socialism has modified traditions of crime and punishment to some extent, but the overriding concern for social order and the ability of the state to guide society has not diminished.
机译:一个国家的法律制度及其对犯罪的反应反映了当时的经济,政治和文化状况,以及普遍的价值观和习俗。以中国这个世界上最古老的持续文明为例,刑事司法制度包含了仍然具有影响力的古老传统。历史悠久的宇宙学传统在人类行为违反社会规范时将自然视为受害者。因此,施加了严厉的惩罚,严格地模仿了自然的暴力方面:如果受害者死亡,即使是偶然死亡,也必须有人死,以平衡对自然造成的伤害。儒家传统发展了一种相互竞争的自然哲学,该哲学通过对道德行为进行适当的道德教育来恢复社会和自然秩序,从而缓和了惩罚。儒家旨在通过说服领导人在有限使用原始权力和惩罚的基础上建立一个和谐社会来在没有中央权威的情况下维持文明。最终,法治主义者的传统恢复了严厉的惩罚,以强加于一个支离破碎的社会的秩序,在这个社会中,当地专制者一直在进行任意判断。但是,法治主义承载着其自身毁灭的种子,并要求儒家思想在建立持久的治理和正义体系中取得平衡。每个传统都是作为解决一系列特定的社会和政治问题的方式发展的,每个传统都作为对诸如如何应对社会混乱的长期性问题的部分解决方案而得以坚持。尽管中国的刑事司法在1911年之后被西方化,但较古老的传统仍然具有影响力。社会主义在一定程度上改变了犯罪和惩罚的传统,但对社会秩序和国家指导社会的能力的压倒一切并未减少。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American Journal of Economics and Sociology》 |2017年第5期|1191-1218|共28页
  • 作者单位

    China Univ Polit Sci & Law CUPL, Beijing, Peoples R China|CUPL, Res Ctr Proc Marxism & Philosophy Praxis, Beijing, Peoples R China;

    CUPL, Beijing, Peoples R China;

    CUPL, Beijing, Peoples R China;

    CUPL, Beijing, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:43:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号