【24h】

The Soviet-Afghan War in Fiction

机译:苏非小说战争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fictionalized accounts, particularly feature films, about the Soviet-Afghan War in the 1980s have played a significant role in shaping public opinion about the history of the region and issues related to Islamic militancy. Novels and films in the West have portrayed the Soviet army as brutal and genocidal and the mujahideen who resisted the invaders as freedom fighters. Russian movies have also portrayed the soldiers in a somewhat negative light and the mujahideen as evil terrorists. No fictional treatment has provided enough background to the conflict to reveal that the Russians entered Afghanistan only to provide support to a communist regime that had gained power on its own, and none have revealed the extent of aid from the United States, the United Kingdom, Iran, Pakistan, and China to the mujahideen. The CIA sponsored Charlie Wilson's War, the movie that comes closest to capturing the larger context of the war, but even in that case, crucial elements were removed from early drafts of the script that presented a more complex and accurate picture of the war. In particular, movies have failed to explore the possible links between U.S. support for mujahideen in the 1980s and violent attacks by Islamic extremists since 2001. The one exception is Charlie Wilson's War, where changes to the script had the result of downplaying and trivializing those links.
机译:关于1980年代的苏联-阿富汗战争的虚构记载,特别是故事片,在塑造有关该地区历史和伊斯兰激进分子问题的舆论方面发挥了重要作用。西方的小说和电影将苏联军队描绘成残酷,种族灭绝的士兵和圣战者,他们抵抗入侵者成为自由战士。俄罗斯电影也以一些负面的角度描绘了士兵,并将圣战者描绘成邪恶的恐怖分子。没有任何虚构的处理方式为冲突提供了足够的背景资料,以表明俄罗斯人进入阿富汗只是为自己独立获得政权的共产主义政权提供支持,而没有人透露美国,联合王国,伊朗,巴基斯坦和中国加入圣战组织。中央情报局赞助了查理·威尔逊的《战争》,这部电影最接近战争的大背景,但即使在这种情况下,剧本的早期草稿中也删除了一些关键要素,从而更清晰地反映了战争情况。特别是,电影未能探讨美国在1980年代对圣战者组织的支持与2001年以来伊斯兰极端分子的暴力袭击之间的可能联系。唯一的例外是查理·威尔逊的战争,对剧本的更改导致对这些联系的轻描淡写和琐碎化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号