首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Punishing Abortion: Duty, Morality, and Practicality in Early 20(th)-Century France
【24h】

Punishing Abortion: Duty, Morality, and Practicality in Early 20(th)-Century France

机译:惩罚性堕胎:20世纪初法国的义务,道德和实用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Debates over the legality and morality of abortion in Europe, especially France, were quite different in the early 20(th) century than they became in Europe and America after widespread legalization. Instead of focusing on the potential rights of the unborn, politically powerful pro-natalist activists and their less influential neo-Malthusian adversaries debated the need for larger populations, the role of abortion in facilitating sexual immorality, and the economics of single motherhood. The fetus was largely ignored as most French people continued to hold pre-modern views of abortion prior to fetal movement as the morally neutral act of restoring delayed menstruation. French juries often showed leniency to women who aborted, although they more frequently voted to convict abortionists, especially midwives.
机译:在欧洲,特别是在法国,关于堕胎的合法性和道德的争论在20世纪初期与在广泛合法化之后的欧美发生了很大的不同。他们没有关注未出生的,有政治影响力的促产主义主义者和他们的影响力较弱的新马尔萨斯主义者的潜在权利,而是辩论了是否需要更多的人口,堕胎在促进性不道德行为中的作用以及单身母亲的经济。胎儿在​​很大程度上被忽略了,因为大多数法国人在胎儿运动之前继续保持流产前的现代观点,因为这是恢复月经推迟的道德中立行为。法国陪审团通常对流产的妇女宽容,尽管她们更频繁地投票赞成对堕胎者定罪,特别是助产士。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号