首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Birth of the Modern Corporation: From Servant of the State to Semi-Sovereign Power
【24h】

Birth of the Modern Corporation: From Servant of the State to Semi-Sovereign Power

机译:现代公司的诞生:从国家的仆人到半主权国家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is widely known that large business corporations have accumulated enormous political and economic power since the early 20(th) century. They not only create barriers to entry to small firms in the economic domain, they also pose a serious threat to democracy by dominating public discourse and occupying a wide range of public spaces. Efforts to halt or reverse the growth of corporate power have been largely ineffective, in large part because they have been entirely reactive. In order for citizens to reclaim the economy and politics, a new strategy is necessary, one that starts by analyzing the source of corporate power. The method of analysis in this article is historical, specifically the history of changes in the United States of the legal instruments of incorporation and their relationship to emerging conditions in the economy and business. In the first half of the 19(th) century, corporations were chartered by state governments to carry out public benefit activities, particularly infrastructure projects. These mixed corporations lost favor during the depression of the 1840s and were replaced by private for-profit corporations that continued using the same debt financing instruments employed by states. They were also still regulated by the states that issued their charters. When corporations sought to avoid competition by creating cartels, they had difficulty maintaining discipline and discovered they needed new rights in order to gain permanent control of markets. In the 1890s, they were granted the status of natural persons, with the legal protections of citizens, but they also gained the right to buy other corporations, thereby solidifying their market power and making them largely autonomous from public control. Each transition was contested, but when it was completed, it seemed to the public as if corporations had always had their new powers. In order to regain the power to hold corporations accountable to the public, those old contested issues need to be brought back into public discourse, so that citizens might decide for themselves how much power corporations should have.
机译:众所周知,自20世纪初以来,大型商业公司已经积累了巨大的政治和经济实力。它们不仅在经济领域为小企业的进入设置了障碍,而且还通过主导公共话语并占据广泛的公共场所,对民主构成了严重威胁。停止或扭转公司实力增长的努力在很大程度上是无效的,很大程度上是因为它们完全是被动的。为了使公民恢复经济和政治,必须采取一项新策略,该策略首先要分析公司实力的来源。本文中的分析方法是历史性的,特别是在美国注册公司法律文书的变更历史及其与经济和商业中新兴条件的关系。在19世纪上半叶,州政府特许公司开展公益活动,特别是基础设施项目。这些混合型公司在1840年代的萧条时期失宠了,取而代之的是私人营利性公司,这些公司继续使用与各州相同的债务融资工具。他们还受到发布宪章的州的监管。当公司试图通过创建卡特尔来避免竞争时,他们很难保持纪律,并发现他们需要新的权利才能获得对市场的永久控制权。在1890年代,他们被授予自然人的地位,并受到公民的法律保护,但他们也获得了购买其他公司的权利,从而巩固了他们的市场力量,并使他们在很大程度上不受公共控制。每次过渡都存在争议,但是当过渡完成时,在公众看来,公司似乎总是拥有新的权力。为了重新获得使公司对公众负责的权力,需要将那些古老的有争议的问题重新纳入公众讨论范围,以便公民可以自己决定公司应拥有多少权力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号