首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Modern Pirates: How Arbitration Lawyers Help Corporations Seize National Assets and Limit State Autonomy
【24h】

Modern Pirates: How Arbitration Lawyers Help Corporations Seize National Assets and Limit State Autonomy

机译:现代海盗:仲裁律师如何帮助公司抢占国家资产并限制国家自治

获取原文
       

摘要

Large-scale companies have worked for centuries with the governments of powerful nations to extract wealth from the rest of the world. Since the 1990s, one important method of continuing that legacy has been the use of secretive legal proceedings known as investor-state dispute settlements (ISDS). Through this innocuous-sounding practice, transnational corporations (TNCs) are able to blame foreign governments for their failure to extract as large a profit as they anticipated from their operations abroad. Asserting that changes in fiscal, environmental, or social policies have harmed them, TNCs have claimed that foreign governments should compensate them for the loss of potential revenues. ISDS tribunals have awarded billions of dollars as a result of such claims, mostly made under the auspices of bilateral investment treaties. Not only must governments spend millions of dollars defending themselves against assaults and tens or hundreds of millions if they lose their cases, but the ISDS system also has a chilling effect on the adoption of legislation designed to protect the health and safety of citizens. As a result of all the lawsuits in which corporations collect damages from governments under investment treaties, an array of groups in the legal industry have profited substantially: law firms representing corporate interests, arbitrators and other specialists in corporate arbitration, and litigation funders. The arbitration industry is, as a practical matter, the glue that holds the system together. The law firms involved in this industry do not wait passively for cases to arise. Instead, they actively pursue corporations to seek arbitration with governments, proselytize for the legitimacy of the current international investment regime, and block reforms that would limit arbitration opportunities. By creating methods of insulating TNCs from normal business risks and forcing host governments to bear the burden of liabilities, the arbitration system has effectively reinstituted a neo-colonial regime through the judicial system.
机译:大型公司与强大国家的政府合作已有数百年历史,以从世界其他地方提取财富。自1990年代以来,延续这一遗产的一种重要方法是使用秘密的法律程序,称为投资者与国家间的争端解决(ISDS)。通过这种无害的做法,跨国公司(TNC)能够责怪外国政府未能从他们在国外的业务中获得预期的最大利润。跨国公司断言财政,环境或社会政策的变化损害了他们的利益,声称外国政府应赔偿其潜在收入的损失。由于这种索赔,ISDS法庭已经裁定了数十亿美元,其中多数是在双边投资条约的主持下提出的。政府不仅要花费数百万美元来抵御攻击,如果他们败诉时要花费数千万美元,而ISDS系统也对通过旨在保护公民健康和安全的立法产生冷淡的影响。由于公司根据投资条约向政府收取损害赔偿金的所有诉讼的结果,合法行业中的一系列团体从中获利颇丰:代表公司利益的律师事务所,仲裁员和公司仲裁的其他专家以及诉讼出资人。实际上,仲裁行业是将系统结合在一起的粘合剂。从事这个行业的律师事务所不会被动地等待案件的出现。取而代之的是,他们积极寻求公司寻求与政府的仲裁,宣传当前国际投资制度的合法性,并阻止可能限制仲裁机会的改革。通过建立使跨国公司免受正常商业风险影响的方法,并迫使东道国政府承担债务负担,仲裁制度通过司法制度有效地重新建立了新殖民主义制度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号