首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Transnational Corporations and Urban Development
【24h】

Transnational Corporations and Urban Development

机译:跨国公司与城市发展

获取原文
       

摘要

Transnational corporations (TNCs) in Africa play significant roles in controlling utilities, privately appropriating common resources, and planning urban space. On the one hand, the extralegal powers of TNCs are legitimized with patronizing discourses about the incompetence of African nations in managing their own affairs and with the specter of a resource curse that supposedly immobilizes the self-governing capacities of Africans. On the other hand, TNCs arrogate to themselves statutory municipal power, ignore or manipulate various channels of accountability, and privately appropriate sociallycreated rents. Some critics of TNCs propose a withdrawal from globalization or greater regulation to limit the power of TNCs. But protectionist or isolationist approaches are entirely mistaken and further undermine the social management of the commons in Africa. Instead, Africans should seek directly to break the chains of monopoly and oligopoly, especially over natural resources. They should also strive to use land for the common good and to systematically build social states in Africa to overcome subservience to TNCs. While previous attempts at autonomous development in Africa have sometimes led to military action by former colonizers and current neo-colonial imperialists, recent evidence from Africa suggests that such a strategy might succeed now. This article proposes to extend the politics of urban reform in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era in the United States to contemporary Africa. In doing so, it shows how African cities today are working to create local capacity by municipalizing services that have been privatized, such as distribution of water. Despite many obstacles posed by TNCs and their home governments, Africans are making great strides to overcome the enduring legacies of colonialism.
机译:非洲的跨国公司(TNC)在控制公用事业,私人占用公共资源和规划城市空间方面发挥着重要作用。一方面,跨国公司的法外权力通过光顾有关非洲国家无权管理自己的事务的言论而合法化,并带有资源诅咒的幽灵,该诅咒据说使非洲人的自治能力无法发挥作用。另一方面,跨国公司行使自己的法定市政权力,无视或操纵各种问责制渠道,并私自采用社会创造的租金。一些跨国公司的批评者建议退出全球化或加强监管以限制跨国公司的权力。但是,保护主义或孤立主义的做法是完全错误的,并进一步破坏了非洲公地的社会管理。相反,非洲人应直接寻求打破垄断和寡头垄断的链条,特别是在自然资源上。他们还应努力为共同利益使用土地,并系统地建立非洲的社会国家,以克服对跨国公司的服从。尽管以前在非洲进行自治发展的尝试有时导致前殖民者和当前的新殖民帝国主义者采取军事行动,但非洲最近的证据表明,这种战略现在可能会成功。本文建议将美国镀金时代和进步时代的城市改革政治扩展到当代非洲。通过这样做,它显示了当今非洲城市如何通过将私有化的服务(例如水的分配)市政化来创造本地能力。尽管跨国公司及其母国政府构成了许多障碍,但非洲人仍在克服殖民主义的持久遗产方面取得了长足的进步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号