首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >On the Perils of Race Neutrality and Anti-Blackness: Philosophy as an Irreconcilable Obstacle to (Black) Thought
【24h】

On the Perils of Race Neutrality and Anti-Blackness: Philosophy as an Irreconcilable Obstacle to (Black) Thought

机译:种族中立和反黑人的危险:哲学是对(黑人)思想的不可调和的障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Race-neutral philosophies often depend on the illusion of a universal humanist orientation. This philosophical position, while common, often misses what is concretely at stake in the diagnosis and analyses of anti-Black racism in the United States. This article argues that racism is part of a deliberate strategy of academic philosophy to keep the discipline white. When one considers the demographic underrepresentation of Blacks compared to other groups in the academy, the use of universal pretenses to negate the experiences of racial minorities, and the sociological realities of race and racism in America, academic philosophy emerges as one of many ideological stratagems used to deny the realities of death and dying in our society. The authors argue that race neutrality and colorblindness cloak the societal consequences and disciplinary practices that allow segregation, violence, and anti-Black death to continue unabated.
机译:种族中立的哲学通常取决于普遍的人本主义取向的幻想。尽管这种哲学立场是普遍的,但常常错过了在美国反黑人种族主义的诊断和分析过程中具体遇到的问题。本文认为,种族主义是使学科保持白色的蓄意学术哲学策略的一部分。当考虑到黑人与学院中其他群体相比人口统计学上的代表不足,使用普遍的借口来否定种族少数群体的经历以及美国种族和种族主义的社会学现实时,学术哲学便成为许多使用的意识形态策略之一否认我们社会死亡和死亡的现实。作者认为,种族中立和色盲掩盖了社会后果和纪律做法,使种族隔离,暴力和反黑人死亡现象得以持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号