...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Economist >THE ACCURACY, MARKET ETHIC, AND INDIVIDUAL MORALITY SURROUNDING THE PROFIT MAXIMIZATION ASSUMPTION
【24h】

THE ACCURACY, MARKET ETHIC, AND INDIVIDUAL MORALITY SURROUNDING THE PROFIT MAXIMIZATION ASSUMPTION

机译:围绕利润最大化假设的准确性,市场道德和个人道德

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper hinges on the distinction between "maximizing profit" and "making profit." It recounts from Adam Smith the ethical basis for profit making, and observes in Augustin Cournot why the maximization assumption was introduced. Several introductory texts are examined to observe how profit maximization is presented. The veracity of the assumption is challenged by considering: owner/ managers who focus on utility rather than profit, corporate maximization of shareholder wealth, corporate managers who pursue personal benefits, and evidence of "corporate social responsibility." Milton Friedman's 1970 New York Times Magazine essay, "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits" is used to support that the ethical justification for the market system does not rest on maximizing profit, and that individuals often have moral latitude to pursue non-pecuniary business goals alongside seeking profit. Teaching that all firms maximize profit poorly educates students concerning how many firms actually behave and it reinforces a pecuniary value.
机译:本文的重点在于“最大化利润”与“赚取利润”之间的区别。它从亚当·斯密(Adam Smith)讲述了获利的道德基础,并在奥古斯丁·古诺(Augustin Cournot)中观察了为什么引入最大化假设。研究了几篇介绍性文章,以观察如何实现利润最大化。该假设的真实性受到以下因素的挑战:关注效用而非利润的所有者/经理,股东财富的公司最大化,追求个人利益的公司经理以及“企业社会责任”的证据。弥尔顿·弗里德曼(Milton Friedman)在1970年《纽约时报》发表的文章中,“企业的社会责任是增加利润”用来支持市场体系的道德依据不在于最大化利润,而且个人通常具有道德上的追求自由的道理。 -追求利润的同时实现经济目标。教导所有公司最大程度地提高利润的做法使学生无法了解多少公司实际行为,并增强了金钱价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号