首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Empathy or Antipathy? The Impact of Diversity
【24h】

Empathy or Antipathy? The Impact of Diversity

机译:移情还是反感?多样性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While the enormous costs of ethnic and class divisions are depressingly familiar (William Easterly and Ross Levine, 1997; Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz, 1997; Paolo Mauro, 1995; James M. Poterba, 1997; Alberto Alesina et al., 1999), much less is known about the impact of various policies designed to ameliorate conflict between groups. Different countries have followed very different policies regarding ethnicity. Some, such as France, encourage mixing and assimilation. Others, such as Belgium, with its separate French and Flemish higher-education systems, seek to preserve the cultural identity of different communities. Much of the recent emphasis on diversity in U.S. schools and workplaces is motivated by the view that mixing between members of different groups will break down stereotypes and encourage development of deeper understanding and, with it, more empathetic attitudes toward other groups (Thomas F. Pettigrew and Linda R. Tropp, 2000). On the other hand, some argue that deliberate efforts to encourage mixing may actually inflame tensions and exacerbate conflict (Walter G. Stephan, 1978).
机译:尽管种族和阶级分裂的巨大成本令人难以置信(威廉·伊斯特利和罗斯·莱文,1997;克劳迪娅·戈尔丁和劳伦斯·卡茨,1997;保罗·毛罗,1995;詹姆斯·M·波特巴,1997;阿尔贝托·阿莱斯纳等,1999)。 ),对于旨在缓解群体之间冲突的各种政策的影响知之甚少。不同国家对种族采取了截然不同的政策。一些国家,例如法国,鼓励混合和同化。其他国家,例如比利时,分别设有法国和佛兰德的高等教育系统,力图维护不同社区的文化特征。最近在美国学校和工作场所中对多样性的强调主要是出于以下观点的动机:不同群体成员之间的混合将打破陈规定型观念,并鼓励人们加深对其他群体的理解(Thomas F. Pettigrew)和Linda R. Tropp,2000年)。另一方面,有人认为,故意鼓励混合的努力实际上可能激化紧张局势并加剧冲突(Walter G. Stephan,1978)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号