首页> 外文期刊>Agroforestry Systems >Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around?
【24h】

Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around?

机译:是热带家庭花园掩盖了科学,还是相反?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The terms multistrata systems and homegardens, which are used synonymously for the purpose of discussion in this paper, represent a group of seemingly sustainable and profitable agroforestry systems in the tropics. Although practiced for a long time, the systems have been little studied, and most reported studies are descriptive and limited to the identification of plant species involved and location-specific information on their yield and management. The conventional mass-balance approach to estimating the extent of nutrient cycling in some of these systems has raised alarms about potential danger of excessive rates of soil-nutrient depletion from the systems and their consequent unsustainability. Yet, in the field, the systems seem to defy such predictions. Furthermore, these systems that provide sustenance to millions of farm families defy the market-superiority paradigm of neoclassical economics. These contradictions arise, perhaps, from our failure to understand the systems in their right perspectives. The methods and criteria that are used for assessing the productivity and profitability of market-oriented, single-species, agricultural and forestry enterprises may not be appropriate for understanding the ecological and economic 'mysteries' of the time-tested multispecies systems. These systems can contribute greatly to our efforts to develop sustainable agroforestry systems; but new initiatives are needed for accomplishing such a goal. The efforts should start with the collection of basic statistics on the area and number of people involved, and proceed by developing appropriate methodologies, in much the same way as agroforestry research was initiated more than two decades ago.
机译:出于本文讨论的目的,术语“多层系统”和“花园”是同义词,代表了热带地区一组看似可持续且有利可图的农林业系统。尽管已经实践了很长时间,但是对该系统的研究很少,大多数报道的研究只是描述性的,并且仅限于所涉植物物种的鉴定以及有关其产量和管理的特定位置信息。估计这些系统中某些系统中养分循环程度的常规质量平衡方法已经引起了人们对系统中土壤养分耗竭率过高的潜在危险以及随之而来的不可持续性的警觉。然而,在现场,这些系统似乎无视这种预测。此外,这些为数百万农户提供生计的系统违背了新古典经济学的市场优势范式。这些矛盾可能是由于我们未能从正确的角度理解系统而引起的。用于评估以市场为导向的单一物种,农业和林业企业的生产率和利润率的方法和标准可能不适用于理解经过时间考验的多物种系统的生态和经济“奥秘”。这些系统可以极大地促进我们发展可持续农林业系统的努力;但是需要新的举措来实现这一目标。努力应从收集有关地区和人数的基本统计数据开始,并以发展适当的方法论着手,这与二十多年前开始进行农林业研究一样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号