首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America >Performance Evaluation of Different Models of Power Weeders for Pulse Crop Cultivation
【24h】

Performance Evaluation of Different Models of Power Weeders for Pulse Crop Cultivation

机译:脉冲除草机不同型号除草机性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The arduous operation of weeding is usually performed manually with the use of traditional hand tools in upright posture, inducing back pain for majority of labours. Weeding is the one of the labour intensive and tedious operation in pulse cultivation. This situation necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. With this objective to select the suitable power weeder for pulse cultivation a study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). In this case, to suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60 × 10 cm in pulse cultivation. The three models were compared with conventional method of hand weeding. The working width of the power weeders were 60 cm, 60 cm and 30 cm respectively for Model A, B and C. Manual weeding using hand hoe registered maximum weeding efficiency of 83.10 % (wet basis) and 82.5 % (dry basis). The weeding efficiency of Model A was 74.10 % (wet basis) and 73.45 % (dry basis), Model B recorded 63.49 % (wet basis) and 64.15 % (dry basis) and Model C recorded lowest weeding efficiency of 43.43 % (wet basis) and 43.13 % (dry basis). The saving in cost of weeding operation with three models when compared to manual weeding were 75.8, 72.5 and 54.8 % respectively for Models A, B and C. The saving in time of weeding operation using with the three models when compared to the manual weeding was 95.8, 94.6 and 89.8 % respectively for Models A, B and C.
机译:繁琐的除草操作通常是使用传统的手动工具以直立姿势手动进行的,从而给大多数劳动者造成背部疼痛。除草是豆类耕种中劳动强度大且繁琐的操作之一。这种情况需要引入适合脉冲种植的除草机。为了选择适合脉冲耕种的除草机,我们在TNAU田间进行了3种商业除草机模型(A,B和C型)的研究。在这种情况下,为了适应除草机,在脉冲种植中将作物的几何形状修改为60×10 cm。将这三种模型与常规的人工除草方法进行了比较。 A型,B型和C型除草机的工作宽度分别为60 cm,60 cm和30 cm。使用using头进行手动除草的最大除草效率为83.10%(湿基)和82.5%(干基)。模型A的除草效率分别为74.10%(湿基)和73.45%(干基),模型B的除草效率为63.49%(湿基)和64.15%(干基),模型C的除草效率最低,为43.43%(湿基)。 )和43.13%(干基)。与手动除草相比,三种型号的除草操作成本节省分别为75.8%,72.5%和54.8%。与手动除草相比,三种型号的除草操作时间节省为型号A,B和C分别为95.8、94.6和89.8%。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Agricultural Machinery Research Centre Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural university, Coimbatore-3 INDIA;

    Agricultural Machinery Research Centre Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural university, Coimbatore-3 INDIA;

    Agricultural Machinery Research Centre Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural university, Coimbatore-3 INDIA;

  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号