首页> 外文期刊>Age and Ageing >Is physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care effective? Findings from a systematic review
【24h】

Is physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care effective? Findings from a systematic review

机译:长期护理中的老年人身体康复是否有效?系统评价的发现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: to determine the effects of physical rehabilitation for older people resident in long-term care.nDesign: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.nData sources: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PEDro, BritishnNursing Index, ASSIA, IBSS, PsychINFO, DARE, HMIC, NHS EED, HTA, Web of Science, AsLib Index to UK Thesesnand Dissertation Abstracts, the National Research Register, Medical Research Council Register, CRIB, Current ControllednTrials and HSRPRoj.nTrials: all randomised trials investigating physical rehabilitation for people permanently resident in long-term care aged ≥60nyears. The primary outcome was measures of activity restriction.nResults: 49 trials were identified involving 3,611 subjects with an average age of 82years. Intervention duration was typicallyn12weeks with a treatment intensity of three 30-min sessions per week. Exercise was the main component of the interventions.nThe mean attendance rate for 17 studies was 84% (range 71–97%). Thirty-three trials, including the nine trialsnrecruiting over 100 subjects, reported positive findings, mostly improvement in mobility but also strength, flexibility andnbalance.nConclusion: physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care is acceptable and potentially effective. Larger scalenstudies are needed to confirm the findings and should include longer term follow-up and assessment for possible harms.
机译:目的:确定长期康复治疗对老年人的身体康复的影响n设计:随机对照试验的系统评价n数据来源:Cochrane对照试验中央注册,Medline,EMBASE,AMED,CINAHL,PEDro,BritishnNursing索引,ASSIA,IBSS,PsychINFO,DARE,HMIC,NHS EED,HTA,Web of Science,AsLib到英国这些论文摘要的索引,国家研究注册,医学研究理事会注册,CRIB,Current ControllednTrials和HSRPRoj.nTrials:全部随机一项针对年龄≥60岁的长期护理永久居民进行身体康复的试验。主要结果是测量活动受限。n结果:确定了49项试验,涉及3,611名受试者,平均年龄为82岁。干预时间一般为12周,每周3次,每次30分钟。运动是干预措施的主要组成部分。n17项研究的平均出勤率是84%(范围71-97%)。 33项试验(包括9项试验招募了100多名受试者)报告了积极的发现,主要是活动性的改善,但力量,柔韧性和不平衡的改善。n结论:长期护理中的老年人进行身体康复是可以接受的,并且可能有效。需要更大规模的研究来证实发现,并且应该包括长期的随访和对可能危害的评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Age and Ageing》 |2010年第2期|p.169-175|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford RoyalInfirmary, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD9 6RJ, UKAddress correspondence to: A. Forster. Tel: (+44) 1274 383406;

    Fax: (+44) 1274 382766. E-mail: a.forster@leeds.ac.uk;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    rehabilitation, long-term care, older people, systematic review, elderly;

    机译:康复;长期护理;老年人;系统评价;老年人;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:10:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号