首页> 外文期刊>Aerosol Science and Technology >Comparison of Three Particle Number Concentration Calibration Standards Through Calibration of a Single CPC in a Wide Particle Size Range
【24h】

Comparison of Three Particle Number Concentration Calibration Standards Through Calibration of a Single CPC in a Wide Particle Size Range

机译:通过在宽粒径范围内对单个CPC进行校准,比较三种颗粒物浓度校准标准品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We carried out a set of experiments to compare three particle number concentration standards (NCSs) by calibrating the same condensation particle counter (CPC) unit (Model 3772, TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA). The standards were, in the order of operation size range, the primary NCS of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST, Japan), the Single Charged Aerosol Reference (SCAR) (Finland), and the Inkjet Aerosol Generator (IAG) of AIST. The results obtained with the 3 standards were found to agree at all overlapping particle sizes within the uncertainty limits. The relative expanded uncertainties varied between 0.6% and 2.6%, depending on the size and standard, while the overall agreement between the standards was within 0.5%. The observed consistency of the results is an important step toward establishing internationally coherent particle NCSs. As a result, the CPC 3772 was successfully calibrated in a particularly wide size range, approximately from 10 nm to 10 μm. The results indicate that the CPC can be considered as a practical tool for calibrating particle number concentration up to 1 μm. In general, the particle number concentration can be measured up to 2.5 μm without a significant decrease of the detection efficiency. By attaching an appropriate size-classifying inlet, the CPC could be used even for measuring the total number concentration for particles smaller than 2.5 μm, in parallel with the PM2.5 mass measurement. Above this particle diameter, the detection efficiency gradually decreased and reached 50% at about 10 μm.Copyright 2012 American Association for Aerosol ResearchView full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.701023
机译:我们通过校准相同的冷凝粒子计数器(CPC)单元(3772型,TSI Inc.,Shoreview,MN,美国)来进行一组实验,以比较三种粒子数浓度标准品(NCS)。这些标准按操作大小范围的顺序依次为:日本国家先进工业科学技术研究院(AIST)的主要NCS,单次充电气溶胶参考(SCAR)(芬兰)和喷墨气溶胶发生器(IAG) )。发现在不确定度范围内,所有3种标准样品的重叠结果在所有重叠的粒径上均一致。相对扩展的不确定性在0.6%和2.6%之间变化,具体取决于大小和标准,而标准之间的总体一致性在0.5%以内。观察到的结果一致性是建立国际上一致的粒子NCS的重要一步。结果,CPC 3772已成功校准了特别大的尺寸范围,大约从10 nm到10μm。结果表明,CPC可被视为校准高达1μm的粒子数浓度的实用工具。通常,可以测量的颗粒数浓度最大为2.5μm,而不会显着降低检测效率。通过连接适当的尺寸分类入口,CPC甚至可以用于测量小于2.5μm的颗粒的总浓度,与PM 2.5 的质量测量并行。在此粒径之上,检测效率逐渐降低,并在约10μm处达到50%。版权所有2012美国气溶胶研究协会查看全文下载全文相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“类同义词,netvibes, twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.701023

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号