首页> 外文期刊>Aerosol Science and Technology >Comparison of Filter and Wall Deposits From Samplers Used to Collect Airborne Lead-Containing Dusts at Field Sites
【24h】

Comparison of Filter and Wall Deposits From Samplers Used to Collect Airborne Lead-Containing Dusts at Field Sites

机译:用于现场收集空气中含铅粉尘的采样器的过滤器和壁沉积物的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Pairs of Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) and 37 mm closed face cassette samplers (CFC) were deployed where occupational exposures to lead-containing dusts were known to occur. Discrete particle analyses of wall and filter deposits were performed by Scanning Electron Microscopy—Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (SEM-EDX). From the elemental composition and projected area diameter of each particle a density, volume, and mass were calculated, and a mass-weighted size distribution for each filter and corresponding wall deposit determined. Comparison of pairs of wall and filter mass-weighted size distributions by Mann-Whitney statistical analysis shows that in only 3 of 72 examples from either sampler were the distributions significantly different that suggests that the mechanisms of particle deposition on the sampler walls for particles in this size range (0.5 μm through 20 μm) do not differ for the different samplers. Furthermore, in only 4 of 33 sampler pairs did the IOM and CFC results differ. Although these results originate from several distinct processes characterized by different chemical and physical dust generation mechanisms, they suggest that in these environments the measurement of “total dust” by the CFC and inhalable dust by the IOM will be very similar when both samplers are processed the same way with respect to the including or excluding wall deposits with the filter catch. However, these results may not be applicable to environments where larger particles exist.
机译:在已知发生职业性接触含铅粉尘的地方,部署了成对的职业医学研究所(IOM)和37毫米的封闭面部盒式采样器(CFC)。壁和过滤器沉积物的离散颗粒分析是通过扫描电子显微镜–能量色散X射线光谱法(SEM-EDX)进行的。从每个粒子的元素组成和投影面积直径计算出密度,体积和质量,并确定每个过滤器的质量加权尺寸分布和相应的壁沉积物。通过曼恩·惠特尼统计分析对成对的壁和过滤器质量加权尺寸分布进行比较,结果表明,在任一采样器的72个示例中,只有3个的分布显着不同,这表明该粒子在采样器壁上的颗粒沉积机理大小范围(0.5 µm至20 µm)对于不同的采样器没有区别。此外,在33个采样器对中,只有4个的IOM和CFC结果不同。尽管这些结果来自具有不同化学和物理粉尘生成机制的几个不同过程,但它们表明,在两个采样器中,在这些环境中,CFC的“总粉尘”和IOM的可吸入粉尘的测量将非常相似。对于包含或排除壁挂式过滤器壁沉淀物的处理方式相同。但是,这些结果可能不适用于存在较大颗粒的环境。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Aerosol Science and Technology》 |2012年第4期|p.411-418|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Exposure Assessment Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Indiana Uni;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:57:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号