首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Structural Engineering >Advantages of Bi-Directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) Over Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO)
【24h】

Advantages of Bi-Directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) Over Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO)

机译:双向进化结构优化(BESO)优于进化结构优化(ESO)的优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) method evolves a structure from the full design domain towards an optimum by gradually removing inefficient material. The bi-directional ESO (BESO) may start from any initial design and evolve a structure to an optimum by adding and removing material simultaneously. In this paper, a detailed comparison between ESO and BESO has been carried out for stiffness optimization problems. Both 2D and 3D examples shows that the BESO method possesses many advantages over the ESO method such as computational efficiency, robustness of the method and manufacturability of the final topology.
机译:渐进式结构优化(ESO)方法通过逐渐去除效率低下的材料,使结构从整个设计领域向最优方向发展。双向ESO(BESO)可以从任何初始设计开始,并且可以通过同时添加和删除材料来使结构发展到最佳状态。在本文中,对刚度优化问题进行了ESO和BESO之间的详细比较。 2D和3D实例均表明,BESO方法比ESO方法具有许多优势,例如计算效率,方法的鲁棒性和最终拓扑的可制造性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号