...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Polytechnica >Management Processes in Technical-economic Design, Decision-making, Fractals and Market Bubbles
【24h】

Management Processes in Technical-economic Design, Decision-making, Fractals and Market Bubbles

机译:技术经济设计,决策,分形和市场泡沫中的管理流程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Existing economic and management theories of technical-economic processes are very often in practice based on the perception of homogeneity in the application space. A number of technical and economic projects are outlined under the condition that all areas of implementation of management decisions are homogenous and rules that were valid in analogous cases in the past will also be valid in possible future designs and projects. The purpose of this paper was to query such a conviction and indicate new possible directions in the development of the discipline. This involves a new orientation. The orientation will indicate new consideration and direction of thinking. After model interpretation of deterministic chaos in management it was necessary to see the whole series and passages of the area of technical-economic management in another light (Kubik 1982). Perhaps the entire series of educationally splendid statements and passages in textbooks have to be rearranged. In notation the decision processes for selection of management interventions may be seen as a meta-expression. Seeking for principal differentiations and revisions may gain some more argumentation. The presumption of homogeneity in the decision-making area may coincide with all decision mechanisms. Competition evaluation, crisis management decisions in a complicated technical-economic project lead to new and newly-authorized doubts. It is, however, possible that it will be necessary ever in the near future to accept approaches and changes in interpretations of more powerful implementation of interferences between decision-making and implementation areas. The applications of fractals (Mandelbrot 1991) may provide an interesting stimulus for innovation.
机译:现有的技术-经济过程的经济和管理理论在实践中经常基于对应用空间内同质性的认识。概述了许多技术和经济项目,条件是实施管理决策的所有领域都是相同的,并且过去在类似情况下有效的规则在将来可能的设计和项目中也将有效。本文的目的是质疑这种信念,并指出该学科发展的新可能方向。这涉及到新的方向。方向将指示新的考虑和思考方向。在对管理中确定性混乱的模型解释之后,有必要从另一角度看技术经济管理领域的整个系列和过程(Kubik 1982)。也许整个教育系列的精彩陈述和段落都必须重新安排。在符号上,选择管理干预的决策过程可以看作是一种元表达。寻求主要差异和修订可能会引起更多争论。决策领域中同质性的推定可能与所有决策机制都一致。竞争评估,复杂的技术经济项目中的危机管理决策导致新的和新批准的怀疑。但是,有可能在不久的将来有必要接受对决策和执行领域之间更强有力的干扰实施方法和解释的改变。分形的应用(Mandelbrot 1991)可能为创新提供了有趣的刺激。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号