...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Automatica Sinica >Robustness of Watermarking: Is Error Correcting Coding Effective?
【24h】

Robustness of Watermarking: Is Error Correcting Coding Effective?

机译:水印的鲁棒性:纠错编码有效吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Robustness is one of the most important requirements of digital watermarking for many applications. Spread-spectrum based methods are not effective enough to ensure their robustness. By modeling digital watermarking as digital communications, several researchers proposed using error correcting coding (ECC) to improve robustness. However, an important fact that has long been neglected is that due to the imperceptibility requirement, the redundancy introduced by ECC will lead to a decrease of the magnitude of watermark signal. Therefore, a problem arises naturally: Could the usage of ECC effectively improve the robustness of watermarking? This paper addresses this problem from the perspectives of both theoretical analysis and experimental investigation. Our investigation shows that ECC cannot effectively improve the robustness of watermarking against a great majority of various attacks except for cropping and jitter attacks. Hence. ECC should not be considered as a universal measure that can be employed to enhance robustness of watermarking.
机译:鲁棒性是许多应用中数字水印的最重要要求之一。基于扩频的方法不足以确保其鲁棒性。通过将数字水印建模为数字通信,一些研究人员提出使用纠错编码(ECC)来提高鲁棒性。但是,一个长期以来被忽略的重要事实是,由于不可感知性的要求,ECC引入的冗余将导致水印信号幅度的减小。因此,自然会产生一个问题:ECC的使用能否有效地提高水印的鲁棒性?本文从理论分析和实验研究两个角度解决了这一问题。我们的调查表明,ECC不能有效提高针对除裁剪和抖动攻击之外的大多数各种攻击的水印鲁棒性。因此。 ECC不应被视为可以用来增强水印鲁棒性的通用措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号