首页> 外文期刊>ACM transactions on privacy and security >On the Security and Usability Implications of Providing Multiple Authentication Choices on Smartphones: The More, the Better?
【24h】

On the Security and Usability Implications of Providing Multiple Authentication Choices on Smartphones: The More, the Better?

机译:关于在智能手机上提供多种身份验证选择的安全性和可用性:越多越好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The latest smartphones have started providing multiple authentication options including PINs, patterns, and passwords (knowledge based), as well as face, fingerprint, iris, and voice identification (biometric-based). In this article, we conducted two user studies to investigate how the convenience and security of unlocking phones are influenced by the provision of multiple authentication options. In a task-based user study with 52 participants, we analyze how participants choose an option to unlock their smartphone in daily life. The user study results demonstrate that providing multiple biometric-based authentication choices does not really influence convenience, because fingerprint had monopolistic dominance in the usage of unlock methods (111 of a total of 115 unlock trials that used a biometric-based authentication factor) due to users' habitual behavior and fastness in unlocking phones. However, convenience was influenced by the provision of both knowledge-based and biometric-based authentication categories, as biometric-based authentication options were used in combination with knowledge-based authentication options-pattern was another frequently used unlock method. Our findings were confirmed and generalized through a follow-up survey with 327 participants. First, knowledge-based and biometric-based authentication options are used interchangeably. Second, providing multiple authentication options for knowledge-based authentication may influence convenience-both PINs (55.7%) and patterns (39.2%) are quite evenly used. Last, in contrast to knowledge-based authentication, providing multiple authentication choices for biometric-based authentication has less influence on choosing unlock options-fingerprint scanner is the most frequently used option (134 of 187 unlock methods used among biometric-based authentication options).
机译:最新的智能手机已经开始提供多种认证选项,包括引脚,模式和密码(基于知识),以及面部,指纹,虹膜和语音识别(基于生物识别)。在本文中,我们进行了两个用户研究,以调查解锁手机的便利性和安全性受到多种认证选项的影响。在基于任务的用户学习中,使用52名参与者,我们分析了参与者如何选择在日常生活中解锁智能手机的选项。用户学习结果表明,提供多种基于生物识别的身份验证选择并不真正影响方便,因为指纹在解锁方法的使用情况下具有垄断的主导地位(111个共115名使用基于生物识别的认证因素的试验),因此用户的惯常行为和解锁手机的牢度。但是,方便的是通过提供基于知识和基于生物识别的身份验证类别的方便,因为基于生物识别的身份验证选项与基于知识的身份验证选项 - 模式是另一个常用的解锁方法。我们的研究结果通过327名参与者进行了后续调查确认和推广。首先,基于知识和基于生物识别的身份验证选项可互换使用。其次,为基于知识的认证提供多种认证选项可能影响便利性 - 两个引脚(55.7%)和模式(39.2%)非常均匀地使用。最后,与基于知识的身份验证相比,为基于生物识别的身份验证提供多个认证选择对选择解锁选项 - 指纹扫描仪的影响较小是最常用的选项(187个基于生物识别的身份验证选项中使用的方法的134个)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号