首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Safety Tolerability and Efficacy of Azilsartan Medoxomil With or Without Chlorthalidone During and After 8 Months of Treatment for Hypertension
【2h】

Safety Tolerability and Efficacy of Azilsartan Medoxomil With or Without Chlorthalidone During and After 8 Months of Treatment for Hypertension

机译:高血压治疗8个月内和之后含或不含氯噻酮的阿齐沙坦美多西米的安全性耐受性和有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A phase 3, 26‐week, open‐label, titrate‐to‐target study (n=418) assessed the safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL‐M) alone and with chlorthalidone (CLD), followed by a 6‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled reversal phase with change in clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as the primary endpoint. Target blood pressure (BP) was <140/90 mm Hg (<130/80 mm Hg with diabetes/chronic kidney disease). AZL‐M was initiated at 40 mg once a day (QD), force‐titrated to 80 mg at week 4. CLD 25 mg QD could be added (weeks 8–22), if required, to reach target, followed by additional antihypertensives from week 12. At the end of the open‐label phase, mean change in systolic BP (SBP)/DBP from baseline was −23/−16 mm Hg. The most common adverse events, irrespective of treatment, were dizziness (8.9%) and headache (7.2%). Serious AEs were reported in eight patients (1.9%). Consecutive creatinine elevations ≥50% with values exceeding the upper limit of normal (ULN) were reported in nine (2.2%) patients. All returned to below the 50% threshold; most also returned to below the ULN after drug discontinuation. Mean DBP was maintained through the reversal phase in patients receiving AZL‐M, but increased with placebo (difference: −7.8 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval, −9.8 to −5.8; P<.001). AZL‐M alone or with CLD showed good long‐term safety and stable BP improvements in a titrate‐to‐target approach. BP improvements caused by AZL‐M therapy were safely reversible upon AZL‐M withdrawal.
机译:在一项为期26周,开放标签,滴定至目标的第3期临床研究中(n = 418)评估了阿奇沙坦美多佐美(AZL-M)单独和氯噻酮(CLD)的安全性,然后进行了为期6周的双倍安全性评估以临床舒张压(DBP)的变化为主要终点的盲,安慰剂对照逆转期。目标血压(BP)为<140/90 mm Hg(糖尿病/慢性肾脏病患者为<130/80 mm Hg)。 AZL-M的起始剂量为每天一次40毫克(QD),在第4周被强制滴定至80毫克。如果需要,可以添加CLD 25毫克QD(第8-22周)以达到目标,然后再加其他降压药从第12周开始。在开放标签阶段结束时,收缩压(SBP)/ DBP与基线相比的平均变化为−23 / −16 mm Hg。与治疗无关,最常见的不良事件是头昏(8.9%)和头痛(7.2%)。据报道八名患者(1.9%)出现严重的不良事件。九例(2.2%)患者连续出现肌酐升高≥50%,超过正常值上限(ULN)的情况。全部恢复到低于50%的阈值;停药后大多数也回到了正常值上限以下。在接受AZL‐M的患者中,DBP的平均水平在逆转阶段得以维持,但随着安慰剂的升高而增加(差异:-7.8 mm Hg,95%置信区间,-9.8至-5.8; P <.001)。单独的AZL-M或与CLD一起使用时,滴定至目标的方法显示出良好的长期安全性和BP稳定的改善。由AZL‐M疗法引起的BP改善可在AZL‐M撤药后安全地逆转。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号