首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world
【2h】

GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world

机译:数学建模中的GetReal:预测现实世界中药物有效性的研究综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The performance of a drug in a clinical trial setting often does not reflect its effect in daily clinical practice. In this third of three reviews, we examine the applications that have been used in the literature to predict real‐world effectiveness from randomized controlled trial efficacy data. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE from inception to March 2014, the Cochrane Methodology Register, and websites of key journals and organisations and reference lists. We extracted data on the type of model and predictions, data sources, validation and sensitivity analyses, disease area and software. We identified 12 articles in which four approaches were used: multi‐state models, discrete event simulation models, physiology‐based models and survival and generalized linear models. Studies predicted outcomes over longer time periods in different patient populations, including patients with lower levels of adherence or persistence to treatment or examined doses not tested in trials. Eight studies included individual patient data. Seven examined cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and three neurological conditions. Most studies included sensitivity analyses, but external validation was performed in only three studies. We conclude that mathematical modelling to predict real‐world effectiveness of drug interventions is not widely used at present and not well validated. © 2016 The Authors Research Synthesis Methods Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
机译:在临床试验中药物的性能通常不能反映其在日常临床实践中的作用。在这三篇评论的第三篇中,我们研究了文献中根据随机对照试验疗效数据预测现实效果的应用。从开始到2014年3月,我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane方法注册以及重要期刊和组织的网站以及参考文献清单。我们提取了有关模型类型和预测,数据源,验证和敏感性分析,疾病范围和软件的数据。我们确定了12篇文章,其中使用了四种方法:多状态模型,离散事件模拟模型,基于生理的模型以及生存和广义线性模型。研究预测不同患者人群(包括依从性或持久性较低或治疗剂量未在试验中测试的患者)在较长时间段内的预后。八项研究包括个人患者数据。七人检查了心血管和代谢疾病以及三种神经系统疾病。大多数研究都包括敏感性分析,但是只有三项研究进行了外部验证。我们得出的结论是,目前预测药物干预的实际效果的数学模型尚未得到广泛使用,也未得到充分验证。 ©2016作者研究综合方法,由John Wiley&Sons Ltd发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号