首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:大肠手术中的手辅助或腹腔镜辅助方法:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundEvidence of benefits of laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted colectomies (LAC) over open procedures in gastrointestinal surgery has continued to accumulate. With its wide implementation, technical difficulties and limitations of LAC have become clear. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was introduced in an attempt to facilitate the transition from open techniques to minimally invasive procedures. Continuing debate exists about which approach is to be preferred, HALS or LAC. Several studies have compared these two techniques in colorectal surgery, but no single study provided evidence which procedure is superior. Therefore, a systematic review was carried out comparing HALS with LAC colorectal resection.
机译:背景腹腔镜和腹腔镜辅助的Colectomies(LAC)在胃肠道手术中优于开放手术的益处的证据不断累积。随着LAC的广泛实施,LAC的技术难题和局限性已变得显而易见。为了促进从开放技术向微创​​手术的过渡,引入了手动腹腔镜手术(HALS)。关于首选哪种方法,HALS或LAC,存在持续的争论。几项研究在结直肠外科手术中比较了这两种技术,但没有一项研究提供证据证明哪种方法更好。因此,进行了系统评价,比较了HALS与LAC大肠切除术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号