首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Do Ethicists and Political Philosophers Vote More Often Than Other Professors?
【2h】

Do Ethicists and Political Philosophers Vote More Often Than Other Professors?

机译:伦理学家和政治哲学家比其他教授更经常投票吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

If philosophical moral reflection improves moral behavior, one might expect ethics professors to behave morally better than socially similar non-ethicists. Under the assumption that forms of political engagement such as voting have moral worth, we looked at the rate at which a sample of professional ethicists—and political philosophers as a subgroup of ethicists—voted in eight years’ worth of elections. We compared ethicists’ and political philosophers’ voting rates with the voting rates of three other groups: philosophers not specializing in ethics, political scientists, and a comparison group of professors specializing in neither philosophy nor political science. All groups voted at about the same rate, except for the political scientists, who voted about 10–15% more often. On the face of it, this finding conflicts with the expectation that ethicists will behave more responsibly than non-ethicists.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13164-009-0011-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:如果哲学上的道德反思改善了道德行为,那么人们可能会期望伦理学教授在道德上要比社会上类似的非伦理学上的学者表现得更好。在假设诸如投票之类的政治参与形式具有道德价值的假设下,我们考察了职业伦理学家和政治哲学家作为伦理学家亚组的样本在为期八年的选举中的投票率。我们将伦理学家和政治哲学家的投票率与其他三个团体的投票率进行了比较:非伦理学的哲学家,政治学家和非哲学或政治学的教授比较组。除政治科学家外,所有团体的投票率几乎相同,政治科学家的投票率提高了10%至15%。从表面上看,这一发现与伦理学家比非伦理学家更负责任的期望相抵触。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s13164-009-0011-6)包含补充材料,即可供授权用户使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号