首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Comparative Efficacy of Guanfacine Extended Release Versus Atomoxetine for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Applying Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methodology
【2h】

Comparative Efficacy of Guanfacine Extended Release Versus Atomoxetine for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Applying Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methodology

机译:胍法辛缓释对阿托莫西汀治疗儿童和青少年注意缺陷/多动障碍的比较疗效:采用匹配调整的间接比较方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundNo head-to-head clinical trials have been published comparing guanfacine extended release (GXR) and atomoxetine (ATX): two nonstimulants approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, other study designs or methods could be used to indirectly compare these two medications. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is a recent methodology that utilizes individual patient data (IPD) from clinical trials for one treatment and published aggregate data from another treatment to estimate the relative efficacy of both, providing rapid, reliable comparative efficacy results.
机译:背景尚无关于比较胍法辛缓释剂(GXR)和阿莫西汀(ATX)的头对头临床试验的报道:两种非兴奋剂已被批准用于治疗注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)。但是,可以使用其他研究设计或方法间接比较这两种药物。匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)是一种最新方法,该方法利用一项试验的临床试验个体患者数据(IPD)以及另一种疗法的已发布汇总数据来估算两者的相对疗效,从而提供快速,可靠的比较疗效结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号