首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Quantification of total fatty acids in microalgae: comparison of extraction and transesterification methods
【2h】

Quantification of total fatty acids in microalgae: comparison of extraction and transesterification methods

机译:微藻中总脂肪酸的定量:提取和酯交换方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Determination of microalgaes’ fatty acid content is often done with chloroform and methanol according to the Bligh and Dyer extraction, though faster methods exist. A number of comparisons between the Bligh and Dyer and faster methods have resulted in contradicting data, possibly due to differences in algae used and the different versions of the Bligh and Dyer method applied. Here, various forms of direct-transesterification (D-TE) and two-step transesterification (2-TE), including three versions developed in our lab, are compared with the original Bligh and Dyer (Can J Biochem Physiol 37: 911–917, ) extraction and two modifications thereof (Lee et al. J AOAC Int 79:487–492, , and our own acidified version) on microalgae with different cell walls: Isochrysis galbana, Nannochloropsis oculata, and Phaeodactylum tricornutum. In total, fatty acid extracts from 11 methods were separated and quantified by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. Results show that, for N. oculata and P. tricornutum, methods based on chloroform–methanol underestimated the fatty acid content compared with the 2-TE and D-TE methods, which gave similar results. Moreover, D-TE methods are faster than chloroform–methanol methods and use chemicals that are less toxic. Of the D-TE methods, the ones using hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid recovered the most fatty acids, while boron trifluoride recovered slightly less. The main qualitative difference between the fatty acids recovered was that the chloroform–methanol methods recovered less saturated fatty acids in P. tricornutum.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-014-8155-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:尽管存在更快的方法,但是根据Bligh和Dyer提取方法,通常使用氯仿和甲醇来测定微藻的脂肪酸含量。 Bligh和Dyer方法与更快方法之间的许多比较结果导致数据矛盾,这可能是由于使用的藻类差异以及所应用的Bligh和Dyer方法的版本不同所致。在此,我们将各种形式的直接酯交换(D-TE)和两步酯交换(2-TE)(包括我们实验室开发的三种版本)与原始的Bligh和Dyer(Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911-917)进行了比较。 ,)提取及其两种修饰(Lee等人,J AOAC Int 79:487–492,以及我们自己的酸化版本),其微藻具有不同的细胞壁:球藻等鞭毛虫,拟南芥和三角角藻。总共,从11种方法中提取的脂肪酸提取物被分离,并通过质谱气相色谱法进行定量。结果表明,与2-TE和D-TE方法相比,对于氯代甲烷和甲醇的方法,以氯仿-甲醇为基础的方法低估了脂肪酸含量,得出的结果相似。而且,D-TE方法比氯仿-甲醇方法快,并且使用毒性较小的化学物质。在D-TE方法中,使用盐酸和硫酸的方法回收的脂肪酸最多,而三氟化硼的回收率略低。回收的脂肪酸之间的主要质量差异是,氯仿-甲醇法回收的三角果假单胞菌中的饱和脂肪酸较少。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s00216-014-8155-3)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号