首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Participation and performance on paper- and computer-based low-stakes assessments
【2h】

Participation and performance on paper- and computer-based low-stakes assessments

机译:参加基于纸和计算机的低风险评估并取得成果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundHigh-stakes assessments, such the Graduate Records Examination, have transitioned from paper to computer administration. Low-stakes research-based assessments (RBAs), such as the Force Concept Inventory, have only recently begun this transition to computer administration with online services. These online services can simplify administering, scoring, and interpreting assessments, thereby reducing barriers to instructors’ use of RBAs. By supporting instructors’ objective assessment of the efficacy of their courses, these services can stimulate instructors to transform their courses to improve student outcomes. We investigate the extent to which RBAs administered outside of class with the online Learning About STEM Student Outcomes (LASSO) platform provide equivalent data to tests administered on paper in class, in terms of both student participation and performance. We use an experimental design to investigate the differences between these two assessment conditions with 1310 students in 25 sections of 3 college physics courses spanning 2 semesters.
机译:背景信息高考评估,例如毕业生记录考试,已经从纸质过渡到计算机管理。低风险的基于研究的评估(RBA),例如“部队概念清单”,直到最近才开始向使用在线服务的计算机管理过渡。这些在线服务可以简化评估的管理,评分和解释,从而减少教师使用RBA的障碍。通过支持教师对其课程效果的客观评估,这些服务可以刺激教师改变课程以提高学生的学习成绩。我们调查在课堂以外使用在线学习STEM学生成果(LASSO)平台进行管理的RBA在学生参与度和表现方面提供与在纸上纸上进行的考试相当的数据的程度。我们使用实验设计来调查这两个评估条件之间的差异,在3个大学物理课程的2个学期的25个部分中有1310名学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号