首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >What Exactly is Meant by Loss of Domain for Ventral Hernia? Systematic Review of Definitions
【2h】

What Exactly is Meant by Loss of Domain for Ventral Hernia? Systematic Review of Definitions

机译:腹疝的域名丢失到底意味着什么?对定义进行系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Large ventral hernias are a significant surgical challenge. “Loss of domain” (LOD) expresses the relationship between hernia and abdominal volume, and is used to predict operative difficulty and success. This systematic review assessed whether different definitions of LOD are used in the literature. The PubMed database was searched for articles reporting large hernia repairs that explicitly described LOD. Two reviewers screened citations and extracted data from selected articles, focusing on the definitions used for LOD, study demographics, study design, and reporting surgical specialty. One hundred and seven articles were identified, 93 full-texts examined, and 77 were included in the systematic review. Sixty-seven articles were from the primary literature, and 10 articles were from the secondary literature. Twenty-eight articles (36%) gave a written definition for loss of domain. These varied and divided into six broad groupings; four described the loss of the right of domain, six described abdominal strap muscle contraction, five described the “second abdomen”, five describing large irreducible hernias. Six gave miscellaneous definitions. Two articles gave multiple definitions. Twenty articles (26%) gave volumetric definitions; eight used the Tanaka method [hernia sac volume (HSV)/abdominal cavity volume] and five used the Sabbagh method [(HSV)/total peritoneal volume]. The definitions used for loss of domain were not dependent on the reporting specialty. Our systematic review revealed that multiple definitions of loss of domain are being used. These vary and are not interchangeable. Expert consensus on this matter is necessary to standardise this important concept for hernia surgeons.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-018-4783-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:大腹疝气是一项重大的手术挑战。 “视域损失”(LOD)表示疝气与腹部容量之间的关系,并用于预测手术难度和成功率。该系统评价评估了文献中是否使用了LOD的不同定义。在PubMed数据库中搜索了报告大疝气修复的文章,这些文章明确描述了LOD。两名审阅者筛选了引文并从选定的文章中提取了数据,重点关注用于LOD,研究人口统计学,研究设计和报告外科专业的定义。确定了一百零七篇文章,检查了93篇全文,其中77篇被纳入系统评价。 67篇文章来自原始文献,10篇文章来自中学文献。二十八篇文章(占36%)给出了域名丢失的书面定义。它们各不相同,分为六个大类。四个描述了失去域的权利,六个描述了腹带肌肉收缩,五个描述了“第二腹部”,五个描述了不可减少的大疝气。六个给出了各种定义。两篇文章给出了多个定义。二十篇(26%)文章给出了体积定义;八种使用Tanaka方法[疝囊体积(HSV)/腹腔体积],五种使用Sabbagh方法[(HSV)/腹膜总体积]。用于域丢失的定义不依赖于报告专业。我们的系统评价显示,正在使用域丢失的多种定义。它们各不相同,并且不能互换。为了使这个重要的概念对于疝气外科医师来说标准化,必须达成专家共识。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.1007 / s00268-018-4783-7)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号