首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Migration crisis in the EU: developing a framework for analysis of national security and defence strategies
【2h】

Migration crisis in the EU: developing a framework for analysis of national security and defence strategies

机译:欧盟的移民危机:建立分析国家安全和国防战略的框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article addresses migration-security nexus in the EU by assessing Member States’ national security and defence strategies as well as the 2016 EUGS in a time of migration crisis, a crisis that stands as one of the most important geopolitical challenges today in the EU. After developing and applying a framework for analysis derived from a literature review, the existing differences among Member States are clear in terms of strategic cultures and approaches to migration issues. The idea of ‘EU’rope without internal borders is at stake as Schengen is under serious attack due to increasing Eurocentrism and growing extreme right-wing populism, which are a consequence of increasing economic protectionism and international terrorism. The solution seems to depend on two critical uncertainties: the evolution of political and social instability in the North Africa and the Middle East, and the future of the EU itself. The results enlighten a securitization of migration mostly centred on the nation-state and national security rather than on people and human security.
机译:本文通过评估成员国在移民危机时期的国家安全和国防战略以及2016年EUGS,解决了欧盟的移民与安全之间的关系,这一危机已成为当今欧盟最重要的地缘政治挑战之一。在建立并应用从文献综述得出的分析框架之后,会员国之间在战略文化和解决移民问题的方法方面存在明显差异。由于越来越多的欧洲中心主义和极端右翼民粹主义,由于经济保护主义和国际恐怖主义的增加,申根受到了严重的攻击,因此没有内部边界的“欧盟绳索”的概念受到了威胁。解决方案似乎取决于两个关键的不确定性:北非和中东政治和社会动荡的演变以及欧盟本身的未来。结果表明,移民的证券化主要集中在民族国家和国家安全,而不是人民和人类安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号