首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence
【2h】

3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence

机译:经皮肺动脉瓣植入术前RVOT尺寸的3D评估:对比造影磁共振血管造影与3D稳态自由进动序列的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (ceMRA) and 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) during systole and diastole for assessment of the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) in patients considered for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair. We retrospectively evaluated 89 patients (male: 45, mean age 19 ± 8 years), who underwent cardiac-MRI after surgical TOF-repair. Datasets covering the whole heart in systole and diastole were acquired using ECG-gated 3D SSFP and non-gated ceMRA. Measurements were performed in SSFP-sequences and in ceMRA in the narrowest region of the RVOT to obtain the minimum, maximum and effective diameter. Invasive balloon sizing as the gold standard was available in 12 patients. The minimum diameter in diastolic SSFP, systolic SSFP and ceMRA were 21.4 mm (± 6.1 mm), 22.6 mm (± 6.2 mm) and 22.6 mm (± 6.0 mm), respectively. Maximum diameter was 29.9 mm (± 9.5 mm), 30.0 mm (± 7.0 mm) and 28.8 mm (± 8.1 mm) respectively. The effective diameter was 23.2 mm (± 5.7 mm), 27.4 mm (± 6.7 mm) and 24.4 mm (± 6.2 mm), differing significantly between diastole and systole (p < 0.0001). Measurements in ECG-gated SSFP showed a better inter- and intraobserver variability compared to measurements in non-ECG-gated ceMRA. Comparing invasive balloon sizing with our analysis, we found the highest correlation coefficients for the maximum and effective diameter measured in systolic SSFP (R = 0.99 respectively). ECG-gated 3D SSFP enables the identification and characterization of a potential landing zone for PPVI. The maximum and effective systolic diameter allow precise sizing for PPVI. Patients with TOF-repair could benefit from cardiac MRI before PPVI.
机译:比较经四联征考虑经皮肺动脉瓣植入术(PPVI)的患者在收缩期和舒张期期间对比增强磁共振血管造影(ceMRA)和3D稳态自由进动(SSFP)评估右心室流出道(RVOT)的情况法洛(TOF)维修。我们回顾性评估了89例患者(男性:45岁,平均年龄19±8岁),他们在手术TOF修复后接受了心脏MRI检查。使用ECG门控3D SSFP和非门控ceMRA获取涵盖心脏整个心脏收缩和舒张期的数据集。在RVOT的最窄区域中,以SSFP序列和ceMRA进行测量,以获得最小,最大和有效直径。有十二例患者可获得有创球囊大小作为金标准。舒张期SSFP,收缩期SSFP和ceMRA的最小直径分别为21.4 mm(±6.1 mm),22.6 mm(±(6.2 mm)和22.6 mm(±6.0 mm)。最大直径分别为29.9毫米(±9.5毫米),30.0毫米(±7.0毫米)和28.8毫米(±8.1毫米)。有效直径为23.2毫米(±5.7毫米),27.4毫米(±6.7毫米)和24.4毫米(±6.2毫米),舒张期和收缩期之间存在显着差异(p <0.0001)。与在非ECG门控ceMRA中的测量相比,在ECG门控SSFP中的测量显示出更好的观察者间和观察者内变异性。将侵入性球囊尺寸与我们的分析进行比较,我们发现在收缩期SSFP中测得的最大直径和有效直径的相关系数最高(分别为R = 0.99)。 ECG门控3D SSFP可以识别和表征PPVI的潜在着陆区。最大和有效的收缩压直径可精确确定PPVI的尺寸。进行TOF修复的患者可在PPVI前接受心脏MRI检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号