首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Intercomparison on Four Irrigated Cropland Maps in Mainland China
【2h】

Intercomparison on Four Irrigated Cropland Maps in Mainland China

机译:中国大陆四幅农田灌溉图的比对

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Wide-coverage spatial information on irrigated croplands is a vital foundation for food security and water resources studies at the regional level. Several global irrigated-cropland maps have been released to the public over the past decade due to the efforts of the remote sensing community. However, the consistency and discrepancy between these maps is largely unknown because of a lack of comparative studies, limiting their use and improvement. To close this knowledge gap, we compared the latest four irrigated-cropland datasets (GMIA, GRIPC, GlobCover, and GFSAD) in mainland China. First, the four maps were compared quantitatively and neutral regional- and provincial-level statistics of the relative proportions of irrigated land were obtained through regression analysis. Second, we compared the similarities and discrepancies of the datasets on spatial grids. Furthermore, the contributions of mosaic cropland pixels in GlobCover and GFSAD were also analyzed because of their extensive distribution and ambiguous content. Results showed that GMIA has the lowest dispersion and best statistical correlation followed by GRIPC, while the corresponding features of GlobCover and GFSAD are approximately equal. Spatial agreement of the four maps is higher in eastern than western China, and disagreement is contributed mostly by GlobCover and GFSAD. However, divergence exists in the ratios of the different agreement levels, as well as their sources, on a regional scale. Mosaic pixels provide more than half of the irrigated areas for GlobCover and GFSAD, and they include both correct and incorrect information. Our results indicate a need for a uniform quantitative classification system and for greater focus on heterogeneous regions. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the advantage of numerical restriction in the calculations. Therefore, special attention should be paid to integrating databases and to exploring remote sensing features and methods for spatial reconstruction and identification of untypical irrigation areas.
机译:有关灌溉农田的广泛空间信息是区域一级粮食安全和水资源研究的重要基础。在过去的十年中,由于遥感界的努力,已经向公众发布了几张全球灌溉作物地图。但是,由于缺乏比较研究,这些地图之间的一致性和差异在很大程度上是未知的,从而限制了它们的使用和改进。为了弥补这一知识鸿沟,我们比较了中国大陆最新的四个灌溉作物数据集(GMIA,GRIPC,GlobCover和GFSAD)。首先,对这四个地图进行了定量比较,并通过回归分析获得了中性的地区和省级灌溉土地相对比例的统计数据。其次,我们比较了空间网格上数据集的相似性和差异。此外,还分析了马赛克耕地像素在GlobCover和GFSAD中的贡献,因为它们分布广泛且内容不明确。结果表明,GMIA具有最低的分散性和最佳的统计相关性,其次是GRIPC,而GlobCover和GFSAD的相应特征大致相等。东部地区的四张地图的空间一致性高于中国西部,而差异主要是由GlobCover和GFSAD引起的。但是,在区域范围内,不同协议级别的比率及其来源存在差异。马赛克像素为GlobCover和GFSAD提供了一半以上的灌溉区域,并且它们同时包含正确和错误的信息。我们的结果表明需要一个统一的定量分类系统,并且需要更多地关注异质区域。此外,结果表明了计算中数值限制的优势。因此,应特别注意整合数据库,并探索遥感特征和方法,以进行空间重建和非典型灌溉区的识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号