首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Analyzing historical land use changes using a Historical Land Use Reconstruction Model: a case study in Zhenlai County northeastern China
【2h】

Analyzing historical land use changes using a Historical Land Use Reconstruction Model: a case study in Zhenlai County northeastern China

机译:使用历史土地利用重建模型分析历史土地利用变化:以中国东北振来县为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Historical land use information is essential to understanding the impact of anthropogenic modification of land use/cover on the temporal dynamics of environmental and ecological issues. However, due to a lack of spatial explicitness, complete thematic details and the conversion types for historical land use changes, the majority of historical land use reconstructions do not sufficiently meet the requirements for an adequate model. Considering these shortcomings, we explored the possibility of constructing a spatially-explicit modeling framework (HLURM: Historical Land Use Reconstruction Model). Then a three-map comparison method was adopted to validate the projected reconstruction map. The reconstruction suggested that the HLURM model performed well in the spatial reconstruction of various land-use categories, and had a higher figure of merit (48.19%) than models used in other case studies. The largest land use/cover type in the study area was determined to be grassland, followed by arable land and wetland. Using the three-map comparison, we noticed that the major discrepancies in land use changes among the three maps were as a result of inconsistencies in the classification of land-use categories during the study period, rather than as a result of the simulation model.
机译:历史土地使用信息对于理解人为改变土地使用/覆盖对环境和生态问题的时空动态的影响至关重要。但是,由于缺乏空间明确性,完整的主题细节以及历史土地用途变更的转换类型,大多数历史土地用途重建都无法充分满足适当模型的要求。考虑到这些缺点,我们探讨了构建空间明晰的建模框架(HLURM:历史土地利用重建模型)的可能性。然后采用三图比较法对投影重建图进行验证。重建表明,HLURM模型在各种土地利用类别的空间重建中表现良好,并且具有比其他案例研究中使用的模型更高的价值因数(48.19%)。研究区域中最大的土地利用/覆盖类型为草地,其次为耕地和湿地。通过三幅图的比较,我们注意到,三幅图之间土地使用变化的主要差异是由于研究期间土地利用类别的分类不一致,而不是由于模拟模型的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号