首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Sackler Colloquium on Creativity and Collaboration: Revisiting Cybernetic Serendipity: Correlation between tools for thinking; arts crafts and design avocations; and scientific achievement among STEMM professionals
【2h】

Sackler Colloquium on Creativity and Collaboration: Revisiting Cybernetic Serendipity: Correlation between tools for thinking; arts crafts and design avocations; and scientific achievement among STEMM professionals

机译:萨克勒关于创造力与协作的座谈会:重新探讨控制论的偶然性:思维工具之间的相关性;艺术手工艺和设计爱好;和STEMM专业人士的科学成就

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous studies of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medical (STEMM) professionals have identified a common “mental toolkit” composed of 13 “tools for thinking” that STEMM professionals use in their problem raising and problem solving. The present research surveyed a convenience sample of 225 STEMM professionals to investigate whether these “thinking tools” are correlated with STEMM achievement measured variously as patents filed or licensed, companies founded, number of papers and books published, and copyrights assigned. Some mental skills such as modeling and playing are significantly correlated with patent filings and licenses, and others are correlated with different measures of STEMM achievement. Previous research has also demonstrated that some of these thinking tools, most notably visual thinking skills, can be taught through various arts, crafts, and design (ACD) practices, resulting in significant improvements in STEMM learning outcomes. The present research therefore investigates in the survey pool whether ACD are associated with the same measures of STEMM achievement as thinking tool use. Correlations exist between use of some thinking tools and particular ACD avocations: Modeling and playing are correlated with persistent crafts avocations such as metalworking, woodworking, and mechanics, which are, in turn, significantly correlated with patent production. Most survey participants were explicitly aware of the connections between their ACD avocations; their STEMM work; and the tools, skills, and knowledge derived from the former. We conclude that integrating ACD with STEMM content by means of tools for thinking may be an effective way to achieve improved STEMM learning outcomes.
机译:先前对科学,技术,工程,数学和医学(STEMM)专业人员的研究已经确定了一个通用的“心理工具包”,该工具包由13种“思维工具”组成,供STEMM专业人员在其提出问题和解决问题的过程中使用。本研究调查了225名STEMM专业人士的便利样本,以调查这些“思维工具”是否与STEMM成就相关联,这些成就可以通过专利或许可,公司成立,论文和书籍出版数量以及版权分配等多种方式进行衡量。一些心理技能(例如建模和演奏)与专利申请和许可显着相关,而其他一些技能与STEMM成就的不同衡量标准相关。先前的研究还表明,可以通过各种艺术,手工艺和设计(ACD)实践来教授其中一些思维工具,尤其是视觉思维技巧,从而显着改善STEMM学习成果。因此,本研究在调查池中调查ACD是否与思维工具使用与STEMM成就相同的度量相关联。在使用某些思维工具与特定的ACD爱好之间存在相关性:建模和演奏与诸如金属加工,木工和力学之类的持久性工艺品爱好相关,而继而又与专利生产显着相关。大多数调查参与者清楚地意识到他们的ACD需求之间的联系。他们的STEMM工作;以及从前者衍生的工具,技能和知识。我们得出的结论是,通过思维工具将ACD与STEMM内容集成在一起可能是实现改善的STEMM学习成果的有效途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号