首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Coevolution of farming and private property during the early Holocene
【2h】

Coevolution of farming and private property during the early Holocene

机译:全新世早期农业与私有财产的共同演变

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The advent of farming around 12 millennia ago was a cultural as well as technological revolution, requiring a new system of property rights. Among mobile hunter–gatherers during the late Pleistocene, food was almost certainly widely shared as it was acquired. If a harvested crop or the meat of a domesticated animal were to have been distributed to other group members, a late Pleistocene would-be farmer would have had little incentive to engage in the required investments in clearing, cultivation, animal tending, and storage. However, the new property rights that farming required—secure individual claims to the products of one’s labor—were infeasible because most of the mobile and dispersed resources of a forager economy could not cost-effectively be delimited and defended. The resulting chicken-and-egg puzzle might be resolved if farming had been much more productive than foraging, but initially it was not. Our model and simulations explain how, despite being an unlikely event, farming and a new system of farming-friendly property rights nonetheless jointly emerged when they did. This Holocene revolution was not sparked by a superior technology. It occurred because possession of the wealth of farmers—crops, dwellings, and animals—could be unambiguously demarcated and defended. This facilitated the spread of new property rights that were advantageous to the groups adopting them. Our results thus challenge unicausal models of historical dynamics driven by advances in technology, population pressure, or other exogenous changes. Our approach may be applied to other technological and institutional revolutions such as the 18th- and 19th-century industrial revolution and the information revolution today.
机译:大约在一千年前,农业的出现既是文化的革命,也是技术的革命,需要新的产权制度。在更新世晚期,在流动的狩猎者和采集者中,几乎可以肯定的是,食物被广泛分享。如果要将收获的农作物或家畜的肉分发给其他小组成员,则已故的晚更新世农民将没有动力进行所需的清理,耕种,动物饲养和储存投资。但是,耕作所需的新财产权利(即对劳动成果的个人权利的可靠主张)是不可行的,因为无法在经济上划定和捍卫觅食经济中大多数流动和分散的资源。如果耕种的生产力比觅食的生产力高得多,那么解决的“鸡与蛋”难题就可以解决,但最初却没有。我们的模型和模拟说明了尽管发生的可能性不大,但耕作和耕作友好的新产权制度是如何共同出现的。这项全新的革命并不是由先进技术引发的。之所以发生这种情况,是因为可以明确界定和捍卫农民的财富,包括农作物,房屋和动物。这促进了新产权的传播,这有利于采用新产权的团体。因此,我们的结果挑战了由技术进步,人口压力或其他外来变化驱动的历史动态的单因模型。我们的方法可能适用于其他技术和机构革命,例如18世纪和19世纪的工业革命以及当今的信息革命。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号