首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Preventive Medicine Reports >More standing and just as productive: Effects of a sit-stand desk intervention on call center workers’ sitting standing and productivity at work in the Opt to Stand pilot study
【2h】

More standing and just as productive: Effects of a sit-stand desk intervention on call center workers’ sitting standing and productivity at work in the Opt to Stand pilot study

机译:更高的站立感和同样的生产力:站立式试点研究中坐立式办公桌干预对呼叫中心工作人员的坐姿站立和工作效率的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study evaluated the effects of sit-stand desks on workers' objectively and subjectively assessed sitting, physical activity, and productivity. This quasi-experimental study involved one intervention group (n = 16) and one comparison group (n = 15). Participants were call center employees from two job-matched teams at a large telecommunications company in Sydney, Australia (45% female, 33 ± 11 years old). Intervention participants received a sit-stand desk, brief training, and daily e-mail reminders to stand up more frequently for the first 2 weeks post-installation. Control participants carried out their usual work duties at seated desks. Primary outcomes were workday sitting and physical activity assessed using ActivPAL or ActiGraph devices and self-report questionnaires. Productivity outcomes were company-specific objective metrics (e.g., hold time, talking time, absenteeism) and subjective measures. Measurements were taken at baseline, 1, 4, and 19 weeks post-installation. Intervention participants increased standing time after 1 week (+ 73 min/workday (95% CI: 22, 123)) and 4 weeks (+ 96 min/workday (95% CI: 41, 150)) post-intervention, while control group showed no changes. Between-group differences in standing time at one and 4 weeks were + 78 (95% CI: 9, 147) and + 95 min/workday (95% CI: 15, 174), respectively. Sitting time in the intervention group changed by − 64 (95% CI: − 125, − 2), − 76 (95% CI: − 142, − 11), and − 100 min/workday (95% CI: − 172, − 29) at 1, 4, and 19 weeks post-installation, respectively, while the control group showed no changes. No changes were observed in productivity outcomes from baseline to follow-up in either group. Sit-stand desks can increase standing time at work in call center workers without reducing productivity.
机译:这项研究评估了坐立式办公桌对工人客观和主观评估的坐姿,身体活动和生产力的影响。这项准实验研究涉及一个干预组(n = 16)和一个比较组(n = 15)。参加者是澳大利亚悉尼一家大型电信公司的两个工作匹配团队的呼叫中心员工(女性占45%,33±11岁)。干预参与者会收到一个坐立的办公桌,简短的培训以及每天的电子邮件提醒,以便在安装后的前两周更加频繁地站起来。控制人员在坐着的办公桌上执行其日常工作。主要结果是使用ActivPAL或ActiGraph设备和自我报告调查表评估工作日的坐姿和身体活动。生产力结果是公司特定的客观指标(例如,保持时间,谈话时间,旷工)和主观衡量指标。在安装后的基线,1、4和19周进行测量。干预组在干预后1周(+73分钟/工作日(95%CI:22,123))和4周(+96分钟/工作日(95%CI:41,150))后增加了站立时间,而对照组没有变化。小组之间在第1周和第4周的站立时间差异分别为+78(95%CI:9,147)和+95分钟/工作日(95%CI:15,174)。干预组的坐位时间更改为−64(95%CI:−125,−2),− 76(95%CI:−142,−11)和−100分钟/工作日(95%CI:−172, − 29)分别在安装后1、4和19周,而对照组则没有变化。两组从基线到随访均未观察到生产率结果的变化。站立式办公桌可以增加呼叫中心员工的上班时间,而不会降低生产率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号