首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Risk work or resilience work? A qualitative study with community health workers negotiating the tensions between biomedical and community-based forms of health promotion in the United Kingdom
【2h】

Risk work or resilience work? A qualitative study with community health workers negotiating the tensions between biomedical and community-based forms of health promotion in the United Kingdom

机译:风险工作还是弹性工作?与社区卫生工作者进行的定性研究,探讨了联合王国生物医学和基于社区的健康促进形式之间的紧张关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Emplaced health promotion interventions, delivered by community health workers are increasingly being used internationally. However, the application of epidemiological risk knowledge to individuals within such communities is not straightforward and creates tensions for community health workers who are part of the communities that they are serving. Situated qualitative interview data were co-produced with community health workers employed in a superdiverse, deprived, post-industrial region of the United Kingdom, using photo-voice methods, to develop an account of how they made sense of the challenges of their work. The analysis draws on and develops theories of risk work and resilience work, which draw on practice theory. The key findings were that, first, being a critical insider enabled community health workers to make sense of the diverse constraints on health and lifestyles within their community. Second, they understood their own public health role as limited by operating within this context, so they articulated their occupational identity as focused on supporting clients to make small but sustainable changes to their own and their families’ lifestyles. Third, the uncertainties of translating population based risk information to individual clients were (at least partially) resolved at an embodied level, with the community health workers identifying as accessible and trusted role models for the value of changed lifestyles. The article is important for policy and practice as it provides a critique of a rapidly evolving new mode of delivery of public health services, and insights on the development of this new public health workforce.
机译:由社区卫生工作者提供的植入式健康促进干预措施正在国际上得到越来越多的使用。但是,将流行病学风险知识应用于此类社区中的个人并非易事,这会给所服务社区中的社区卫生工作者造成压力。现场定性的访谈数据是与在英国一个超级,贫困,后工业地区工作的社区卫生工作者共同制作的,采用的是语音语音方法,以说明他们如何理解工作中的挑战。该分析借鉴并发展了风险工作和复原力工作的理论,这些理论都基于实践理论。关键发现是,首先,作为关键内幕人士,社区卫生工作者能够理解社区内对健康和生活方式的多种限制。其次,他们了解自己的公共卫生角色受到在这种情况下进行操作的限制,因此他们明确表达了自己的职业身份,重点是支持客户对其自身及其家人的生活方式进行微小但可持续的改变。第三,在具体层面上解决了(至少部分)将基于人群的风险信息传递给个人客户的不确定性,社区卫生工作者将其视为改变生活方式的价值的可及且值得信赖的榜样。这篇文章对政策和实践很重要,因为它对快速发展的公共卫生服务新模式提出了批评,并对新的公共卫生劳动力的发展提出了见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号