首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >A Graph is Worth a Thousand Words: How Overconfidence and Graphical Disclosure of Numerical Information Influence Financial Analysts Accuracy on Decision Making
【2h】

A Graph is Worth a Thousand Words: How Overconfidence and Graphical Disclosure of Numerical Information Influence Financial Analysts Accuracy on Decision Making

机译:图形值得一千个字:数字信息的过度自信和图形披露如何影响财务分析师的决策准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous researches support that graphs are relevant decision aids to tasks related to the interpretation of numerical information. Moreover, literature shows that different types of graphical information can help or harm the accuracy on decision making of accountants and financial analysts. We conducted a 4×2 mixed-design experiment to examine the effects of numerical information disclosure on financial analysts’ accuracy, and investigated the role of overconfidence in decision making. Results show that compared to text, column graph enhanced accuracy on decision making, followed by line graphs. No difference was found between table and textual disclosure. Overconfidence harmed accuracy, and both genders behaved overconfidently. Additionally, the type of disclosure (text, table, line graph and column graph) did not affect the overconfidence of individuals, providing evidence that overconfidence is a personal trait. This study makes three contributions. First, it provides evidence from a larger sample size (295) of financial analysts instead of a smaller sample size of students that graphs are relevant decision aids to tasks related to the interpretation of numerical information. Second, it uses the text as a baseline comparison to test how different ways of information disclosure (line and column graphs, and tables) can enhance understandability of information. Third, it brings an internal factor to this process: overconfidence, a personal trait that harms the decision-making process of individuals. At the end of this paper several research paths are highlighted to further study the effect of internal factors (personal traits) on financial analysts’ accuracy on decision making regarding numerical information presented in a graphical form. In addition, we offer suggestions concerning some practical implications for professional accountants, auditors, financial analysts and standard setters.
机译:先前的研究支持图形是与数字信息解释相关的任务的相关决策辅助工具。此外,文献表明,不同类型的图形信息可以帮助或损害会计师和财务分析师决策的准确性。我们进行了4×2混合设计实验,研究了数字信息披露对财务分析师准确性的影响,并研究了过度自信在决策中的作用。结果表明,与文本相比,柱形图提高了决策的准确性,其次是折线图。表格和文字披露之间没有发现差异。过度自信会损害准确性,并且两性都表现得过于自信。此外,披露的类型(文本,表格,线形图和柱形图)不会影响个人的过度自信,这提供了过度自信是个人特质的证据。这项研究做出了三点贡献。首先,它从较大数量的金融分析师样本(295)而不是较小样本学生样本中提供了证据,表明图形是与数字信息解释相关的任务的相关决策辅助。其次,它使用文本作为基准比较来测试信息公开的不同方式(线形图和柱形图以及表格)如何增强信息的可理解性。第三,它给这个过程带来了一个内在因素:过度自信,一种损害个人决策过程的人格特质。在本文的最后,重点介绍了一些研究路径,以进一步研究内部因素(人格特质)对财务分析师以图形形式呈现的数字信息进行决策的准确性的影响。此外,我们提供有关对专业会计师,审计师,财务分析师和标准制定者的一些实际影响的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号