首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>NeuroRx >Effects of Marketed Antiepileptic Drugs and Placebo in the Human Photosensitivity Screening Protocol
【2h】

Effects of Marketed Antiepileptic Drugs and Placebo in the Human Photosensitivity Screening Protocol

机译:市售抗癫痫药和安慰剂在人类光敏筛选方案中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A study of epilepsy patients with a reproducible range of photoparoxysmal responses (PPR) (epileptiform discharges evoked by flashing lights) has been used as a “proof-of-concept” trial to determine if novel potential antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should proceed in development. The standard design for this trial requires a 3-day inpatient stay and is single-blind. We evaluated two marketed and effective AEDs—one narrow-spectrum [carbamazepine (CBZ)], and one broad-spectrum [levetiracetam (LEV)]—using a novel double-blinded, cross-over outpatient version of the trial to detect acute drug effects of the two marketed AEDs on photosensitivity. We tested 6 patients with a known stable photosensitivity response, using single oral doses of CBZ 400 mg and LEV 1000 mg, compared to 2 test days with single placebo doses. Patients who received LEV had the lowest mean PPR (compared with placebo and CBZ). The mixed effect model showed a significant effect of LEV in all eye closure conditions (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of a significant change in PPR after CBZ or placebo treatment. In conclusion, LEV 1000 mg, but not CBZ 400 mg, was effective in suppressing photosensitivity within a 6-h period compared with placebo showing the ability of our novel photosensitivity trial design to demonstrate effects of broad-spectrum AEDs. We cannot confirm the ability of the photosensitivity trial to detect the narrow-spectrum AED CBZ in our design. The novel outpatient study design is feasible and is expected to reduce costs compared with previous methodology.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13311-013-0243-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:一项对癫痫患者进行了可复制范围的光阵发性反应(PPR)(闪光灯诱发的癫痫样放电)的研究已被用作“概念验证”试验,以确定是否应在开发中使用新的潜在抗癫痫药(AED) 。该试验的标准设计需要住院三天,并且是单盲的。我们使用新型双盲,跨界门诊试验评估了两种上市有效的AED,一种是窄谱[卡马西平(CBZ)],另一种是宽谱[左乙拉西坦(LEV)],用于检测急性药物两种市售AED对光敏性的影响。我们使用口服CBZ 400 mg和LEV 1000 mg单次口服剂量测试了6名已知稳定的光敏反应患者,相比之下,使用安慰剂单次使用2个测试日。接受LEV的患者的平均PPR最低(与安慰剂和CBZ相比)。混合效应模型在所有闭眼条件下均表现出LEV的显着效应(p <0.001)。没有证据表明CBZ或安慰剂治疗后PPR发生明显变化。总之,与安慰剂相比,LEV 1000 mg而非CBZ 400 mg有效抑制6小时内的光敏性,这表明我们新颖的光敏性试验设计能够证明广谱AED的作用。我们无法确定设计中光敏试验检测窄光谱AED CBZ的能力。新颖的门诊研究设计是可行的,并且与以前的方法相比有望降低成本。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s13311-013-0243-0)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号